X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
        bh=ue6HXjLsWsHeM6dr0Y86/eXmMMXvc1/ezJJagri/HGA=;
        b=AcShFciAJrBHsLhTVs+ZhwWuX69JGTJu9emIkqUk3fnCHRSxwMGOBwuXetxPv1y1Og
         b3CkMTrngYpLZNoWTRy8B052MM1NuFo+FcqkQxRVMi4nouS6vO4OwtDZM84sL2WXgqBi
         4a5lPfdQKggYRmDGhhNrJXTGYTvqxNTgmNYYRkicclamGRLoHNXs3l/qhu+C4xUvZIpd
         +GZJF+iIes1zKkD76k/zsMz17/HfRKda3CQsc1L0tWm3LRTyAXzvbUr4zmLWqrO94GH0
         8V9proWJzi3xCJt/gDkbv1Kxytc2SnKCZD85AxoqsnRd17FNdSWe9fPEvxcokaYbhrJ7
         N99w==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.194.104.200 with SMTP id gg8mr32897889wjb.144.1445225537217;
 Sun, 18 Oct 2015 20:32:17 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2015 19:32:17 -0800
Message-ID: <CAC4O8c9rjGEsy6NP8kFz5jKRy51NOndbhU37gUa_Om70qbxVKg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: [geda-user] does anyone like -Wdeclaration-after-statement
From: "Britton Kerin (britton DOT kerin AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e010d8212c42e3805226cca9b
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com

--089e010d8212c42e3805226cca9b
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

I find it annoying because you cant just start work in middle of function
without producing a bunch of spurious warnings.

It promotes bad style too because redundancy between declarations and point
of use, and forces use of bogus initializers, inefficient and/or redundance
initializers or no initialize more often.

I would like this warning option to just go away if no one really likes it

--089e010d8212c42e3805226cca9b
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr"><br><div style=3D"">I find it annoying because you cant ju=
st start work in middle of function without producing a bunch of spurious w=
arnings.</div><div style=3D""><br></div><div style=3D"">It promotes bad sty=
le too because redundancy between declarations and point of use, and forces=
 use of bogus initializers, inefficient and/or redundance initializers or n=
o initialize more often.</div><div style=3D""><br></div><div style=3D"">I w=
ould like this warning option to just go away if no one really likes it</di=
v></div>

--089e010d8212c42e3805226cca9b--