X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=E0b7uMtcdavf1B7Ltth3jnYD36iw2CdaVBxHRpAeK/E=; b=DimyMIuG7nz9mL1h/7doGSE4hftRNCoJOSa2evFmrj3n3X8CuW6eJhwFWReWjKMfLs AwB1ykygRs9GphE2CnCKQihGUBXbG7Vo6sWSiRLrL6OJ4b5ns/BbmNDeWrpfcPytjky1 V5aGr3IGIVFtSQfN+duQ+NdblYoxaM8+PO8smaxqhhT9BlNe+plRqOnuS13XIHiAf8BV JX7fzy69COoLsex12cBcRX9LoFtm1+NgnqDpJGWnzKTqAuBk8/LR+BF/o63wR4hj3Mo6 //QKwIOf9nkG+49fnotbqUDpbBZ1N39IoCgPzC6ZBoHNR5D/R7nuZyY2PvqAGgA42Mb3 4H5A== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.194.104.200 with SMTP id gg8mr42210953wjb.144.1443049219776; Wed, 23 Sep 2015 16:00:19 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20150921164548.d9f1367e416d6a2e41b0a23a@gmail.com> References: <201509082040 DOT t88KerD6005455 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <201509091737 DOT t89Hb1nQ021026 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <20150921164548 DOT d9f1367e416d6a2e41b0a23a AT gmail DOT com> Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2015 15:00:19 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [geda-user] New experimental netlist features From: "Britton Kerin (britton DOT kerin AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e010d82122366280520721431 Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk --089e010d82122366280520721431 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 6:45 AM, Nicklas Karlsson ( nicklas DOT karlsson17 AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] < geda-user AT delorie DOT com> wrote: > > ... > > So what you are criticize it the fact that I use buses and bus pins for > > "multiple nets" whereas you prefer to use non-bus nets and ordinary pins? > > > > At least me think bus pins are really good idea. It sounds good to me that a bus would go with a bus pin. I probably don't know all the considerations but that definitely sounds most simple from a first-encounter perspective. Britton --089e010d82122366280520721431 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 6:45 AM, Nicklas Karlsson (nicklas DOT karlsson17 AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] <geda-use= r AT delorie DOT com> wrote:
> = ...
> So what you are criticize it the fact that I use buse= s and bus pins for
> "multiple nets" whereas you prefer to use non-bus nets and o= rdinary pins?
>

At least me think bus pins are really good idea.
It sounds good to me that a bus would go with a bus= pin.=C2=A0 I probably don't know all the considerations but that defin= itely sounds most simple from a first-encounter perspective.

Britton

--089e010d82122366280520721431--