X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=9RfQlOSzKfGQFSykx50539sS5nG5U6fWKbedatiYPs4=; b=VkR5gdaKswAOyrqE3K5dRnb9CmCloIQfxFFTVPisNhacO6Zyzl2y22LXUecMt857FX ivnOobzuY2SVJu6ML7HGDM4w7qbSlKl68N7o7rskhANGBQ+wqb+Wcc0tRIsrS5DpTjuM VU/8Nn47yCeSNxCQEr2dKGTa6oLSFDXzAa3WqN8PkEoUQ4ex6QIv2E/7OfrJ6a6Z8m0C J6zZoxxqztCNs18kkIetIt3V7Bt1eivp7VMCJQWZ2VJkVtb8bb8aTk8LNNkirhrUN6y8 0fgB7Ie566la9Oqe+bFllVIhg5rys8WFFPxUi3LGx/N6qma3y+23LCwYhuk8ol+h7FOS 0ixg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.107.46.228 with SMTP id u97mr25926236iou.165.1442849917029; Mon, 21 Sep 2015 08:38:37 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20150921164331.99aafffaf6386a55ed792d91@gmail.com> References: <201509082040 DOT t88KerD6005455 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <20150921164331 DOT 99aafffaf6386a55ed792d91 AT gmail DOT com> Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2015 08:38:36 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [geda-user] New experimental netlist features (multiple pins one net) From: "Ouabache Designworks (z3qmtr45 AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c15b50c4d9e6052043ac19 Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk --001a11c15b50c4d9e6052043ac19 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 7:43 AM, Nicklas Karlsson ( nicklas DOT karlsson17 AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] < geda-user AT delorie DOT com> wrote: > > On Wed, 9 Sep 2015, Edward Hennessy (ehennes AT sbcglobal DOT net) [via > geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote: > > > Would this proposed feature also work for connecting a single pin to > > > multiple pads? For example, could three pin symbols for transistors > work > > > with devices that have four pads? It would be nice to support all the > > > relationships: > > > > > > - one to one > > > - one to many (3 pin symbol transistor with a 4 pad footprint) > > > - many to one (pass thru pins) > > > - many to many > > > > > > Pass thru pins could make the symbols for parts where the signal passes > > > straight through easier to work with. For example, TVS diode pairs, > feed > > > thru capacitors, and transistors used in current mirrors. > > > > The feature isn't about connected pins/pads on a footprint at all; it's > > about grouping multiple nets (or pins) graphically into a single bus net > > (or bus pin). > > ... > > This is about grouping nets together in a bus it would however be rather > useful with one pin in the symbol then there are several physical pins on > the package on the real circuit. It is for example very common with several > ground pins and in such case it would be possible with a schematic figure > with only one ground pin. > If your package has multilple grounds then your symbol must also have them. They may all be the same node but I have some beefy ground traces between the power supply and drivers that I do not want to tie my sensitive analog grounds pins. Once you have a package where two pins have the same pinname then you have to switch everything over to use pinnumbers instead of pin names. John Eaton --001a11c15b50c4d9e6052043ac19 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 7:43 AM, Nicklas Karlsson (nicklas DOT karlsson17 AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] <geda-use= r AT delorie DOT com> wrote:
> = On Wed, 9 Sep 2015, Edward Hennessy (ehennes AT sbcglobal DOT net) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote:
> > Would this proposed feature also work for connecting a single pin= to
> > multiple pads? For example, could three pin symbols for transisto= rs work
> > with devices that have four pads? It would be nice to support all= the
> > relationships:
> >
> > - one to one
> > - one to many (3 pin symbol transistor with a 4 pad footprint) > > - many to one (pass thru pins)
> > - many to many
> >
> > Pass thru pins could make the symbols for parts where the signal = passes
> > straight through easier to work with. For example, TVS diode pair= s, feed
> > thru capacitors, and transistors used in current mirrors.
>
> The feature isn't about connected pins/pads on a footprint at all;= it's
> about grouping multiple nets (or pins) graphically into a single bus n= et
> (or bus pin).
> ...

This is about grouping nets together in a bus it would however be rather us= eful with one pin in the symbol then there are several physical pins on the= package on the real circuit. It is for example very common with several gr= ound pins and in such case it would be possible with a schematic figure wit= h only one ground pin.


If your package= has multilple grounds then your symbol must also have them. They may all b= e the same node but I have some beefy ground traces between the power suppl= y and drivers that I do not want to tie my sensitive analog grounds pins. <= br>
Once you have a package where two p= ins have the same pinname then you have to switch everything over to use pi= nnumbers instead of pin names.

John= Eaton



--001a11c15b50c4d9e6052043ac19--