X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version
         :content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=a0gK3wIHs83zIJfa2sO4ogWWjcWhcxKAElNBm76UBoo=;
        b=vU9InzcVJMxD6eILPFTdSLZnUzO5PtTwtO+xtRFdM6jOWbgBBeRJOhWKE2YwoXn/b7
         fdEECxKVijjTKg1DTzoYLN6SdmeKzhk04r7HjaDJd88wWrB8DuF60MNqeZB4QheDcy2A
         VNuY/Jt3FGojWBYM3yJyNkltOeiEzq3gzWp3ifCSTjf/1D+3O/tWTSjsbP3H6EjG+vlP
         0RLKCdBzYU+ofuKi6Q0n2s3rC+xnF2eFxWrStiHiCQgBjpegJLAwfNQKwYwASzlqDDRF
         6qasdo4bRrIRb6fNc8qeH64eAW1wXXT49M8vXbzCfcSOCzsgoi6id39+Cc9nCWrOCo3t
         bC3Q==
X-Received: by 10.194.93.35 with SMTP id cr3mr22951420wjb.46.1442846749985;
        Mon, 21 Sep 2015 07:45:49 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2015 16:45:48 +0200
From: "Nicklas Karlsson (nicklas DOT karlsson17 AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: [geda-user] New experimental netlist features
Message-Id: <20150921164548.d9f1367e416d6a2e41b0a23a@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.11.1509211409470.1633@newt>
References: <alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 11 DOT 1509031356150 DOT 13201 AT nimbus>
	<msi77b$6rr$1 AT ger DOT gmane DOT org>
	<alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1509082036590 DOT 3066 AT lichen>
	<201509082040 DOT t88KerD6005455 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
	<alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1509091224440 DOT 3949 AT lichen>
	<201509091737 DOT t89Hb1nQ021026 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
	<alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 11 DOT 1509211409470 DOT 1633 AT newt>
X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.5.0beta1 (GTK+ 2.24.25; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

> ...
> So what you are criticize it the fact that I use buses and bus pins for 
> "multiple nets" whereas you prefer to use non-bus nets and ordinary pins?
> 

At least me think bus pins are really good idea.

Nicklas Karlsson