X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com From: Kai-Martin Knaak Subject: Re: [geda-user] 5630 LED footprint Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2015 23:37:39 +0200 Organization: Institut =?ISO-8859-1?Q?f=FCr?= Quantenoptik Lines: 34 Message-ID: References: <20150910201416 DOT GG16766 AT fi DOT muni DOT cz> <20150918121209 DOT GG9273 AT fi DOT muni DOT cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" X-Complaints-To: usenet AT ger DOT gmane DOT org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 130.75.102.197 User-Agent: KNode/4.14.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id t8ILbtgj005177 Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Jan Kasprzak wrote: > I am thinking about modifying it to use one big pad for cathode and one > for anode (instead of two smaller on each side). According to the > datasheet, the pad near cathode is unconnected, so it can safely be > joined to the cathode pad, and for the anode, both pads are > interconnected inside the LED. What do you think about it? > If the diode is soldered in a reflow oven, the small pads are actually beneficial. They increase the force of surface tension to pull a slightly misaligned component to the center. For manual soldering this does not apply. Maybe, I will follow your suggestion. ---<)kaimartin(>--- PS: Note, that the pin numbers in my footprints are "anode" and "cathode" to make extra sure, nets are not messed up. If your symbols use "1" and "2" the footprint should reflect this enumeration. -- Kai-Martin Knaak tel: +49-511-762-2895 Universität Hannover, Inst. für Quantenoptik fax: +49-511-762-2211 Welfengarten 1, 30167 Hannover http://www.iqo.uni-hannover.de GPG key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?search=Knaak+kmk&op=get