X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2015 12:44:35 +0200 (CEST)
X-X-Sender: igor2 AT igor2priv
To: "geda-user AT delorie DOT com" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
X-Debug: to=geda-user AT delorie DOT com from="gedau AT igor2 DOT repo DOT hu"
From: gedau AT igor2 DOT repo DOT hu
Subject: Re: [geda-user] gschem bugreport: groff
In-Reply-To: <CANqhZFxOy2cb20x60MifHYg=_zVEQDSQPC+jhPtSXnzFxGfcOA@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1509081243280.6924@igor2priv>
References: <alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1509080943400 DOT 6924 AT igor2priv> <CANqhZFxOy2cb20x60MifHYg=_zVEQDSQPC+jhPtSXnzFxGfcOA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (DEB 1167 2008-08-23)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk



On Tue, 8 Sep 2015, Gareth Edwards wrote:

> On 8 September 2015 at 08:47,  <gedau AT igor2 DOT repo DOT hu> wrote:>
>> I think if groff is essential for making gschem and change in groff
>> installation requires a rerunning ./configure, then a missing groff should
>> be a fatal error during configuration. Else we could just notice the user
>> that some documentation couldn't be compiled and go on compiling the rest.
>>
>
> Duplicate of https://bugs.launchpad.net/geda/+bug/795654 I think.

Thanks, duplication confirmed, nice catch!