X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Envelope-From: paubert AT iram DOT es Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2015 13:31:58 +0200 From: Gabriel Paubert To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Subject: Re: [geda-user] Multiple symbols for a single device? Message-ID: <20150414113158.GB29193@visitor2.iram.es> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Spamina-Bogosity: Unsure X-Spamina-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) X-Spamina-Spam-Report: Content analysis details: (-1.0 points) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [URIs: gedasymbols.org] -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -0.0 BAYES_20 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 5 to 20% [score: 0.0513] Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 07:22:08AM -0400, JAMES HARIG wrote: > Hi Everyone, > > I'm playing around with gEDA again. Every time I do, I learn > something new. I'm working with symbols right now, and noticed that > Bill Gatliff (http://www.gedasymbols.org/user/bill_gatliff/) separated > the ATMEGA48/8/168 device into separate symbols. Is this what I > should do for devices with many pins? Yes. > What special logic hooks the > symbols back together when I convert to PCB? Is it just the refdes, or > is there something else I should do also? Only the refdes, that's why you have to number these parts manually. Gabriel