X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=sFG8DE5YjhySt2cM9am85W14Tu72wa/b6yWGIpnzXyY=; b=AthXsVtujjaXwbVNHCmSK8WpQAnQJbkjcD3KGOtXcFQa/5naNSG0VOyDYpmbnTeGy/ G4s+cl6qIc2KfJXmkPC7mKFxAa9GR0xaXrSVfVf6YDh5zLSm8jzK+0WEc7u5U6p0K5Z2 vmTV0JUVdWtp9iHSilLJfHLInzIZXiiw3s9Ag6Lp/qy5UdTBY9FxDzIhj4bLuNQHmTIj IZ6wz809d9DpJxrwW2sXBeJslxCb10Mq0UMu29M3gD5OUrbhmiAMUfT2V9UP2Gp3MGZg MaAK1FOG9GMV92PBbP/7IsykL1PhV6jDpbHL0rNlfASac9lGW8qXwLEsaPzDYxLdN3Jj OhRA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.182.148.98 with SMTP id tr2mr19431257obb.28.1423063475621; Wed, 04 Feb 2015 07:24:35 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <1420499386 DOT 3521 DOT 3 DOT camel AT cam DOT ac DOT uk> <20150202152654 DOT GA13336 AT cuci DOT nl> <54CFD589 DOT 9040702 AT xs4all DOT nl> <20150203112631 DOT 3507a0c1 AT Parasomnia DOT thuis DOT lan> <20150204054256 DOT Horde DOT Pm1JV8RJbICk9SHvIGwZ7A3 AT webmail DOT in-berlin DOT de> Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2015 16:24:35 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [geda-user] FOSDEM From: Svenn Are Bjerkem To: geda-user Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e0158ac6ef5143c050e44c89e Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk --089e0158ac6ef5143c050e44c89e Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On 4 February 2015 at 06:27, Ouabache Designworks wrote: > This is the ideal problem for an open source solution. We all need to do > the same thing. We are all currently spending a huge effort to create our > own unique solutions. The problems are really not that hard. Our toolflows > and scripts are not critical IP that we cannot share. If you wanted to > create a tool flow that was better than 75% of all the toolflows out then > then that is not hard to do. > We just need to agree which scripting language to use for the flow. /Duck -- Svenn --089e0158ac6ef5143c050e44c89e Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

= On 4 February 2015 at 06:27, Ouabache Designworks <z3qmtr45 AT gmail DOT com= > wrote:
This is the ideal= problem for an open source solution. We all need to do the same thing. We = are all currently spending a huge effort to create our own unique solutions= . The problems are really not that hard. Our toolflows and scripts are not = critical IP that we cannot share. If you wanted to create a tool flow that = was better than 75% of all the toolflows out then then that is not hard to = do.

We just need to agree which scri= pting language to use for the flow. /Duck

--
Svenn
--089e0158ac6ef5143c050e44c89e--