X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Message-ID: <53EADB30.3030906@sonic.net>
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2014 20:27:44 -0700
From: Dave Curtis <davecurtis AT sonic DOT net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121028 Thunderbird/16.0.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: [geda-user] rs-274x nits
References: <53EA540E DOT 9000609 AT sonic DOT net> <1407876579 DOT 79247 DOT YahooMailNeo AT web120502 DOT mail DOT ne1 DOT yahoo DOT com> <53EA8692 DOT 4090902 AT sonic DOT net> <1407882017 DOT 64999 DOT YahooMailNeo AT web120501 DOT mail DOT ne1 DOT yahoo DOT com> <C62EE316-BE2E-4667-8238-B7644A8E722E AT sonic DOT net> <1407888247 DOT 11213 DOT YahooMailNeo AT web120501 DOT mail DOT ne1 DOT yahoo DOT com>
In-Reply-To: <1407888247.11213.YahooMailNeo@web120501.mail.ne1.yahoo.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Sonic-CAuth: UmFuZG9tSVb1/zzr/5BwuLAq2w9KVqkzW0Z7nZ4OmXE8kZtlgrkbwX8c7Uzbk5XntivCN6d6hQaWt7/7wiUJKJfvWhdDziTeSxeM9qBI7us=
X-Sonic-ID: C;UN9Pypki5BGNW82354E5FQ== M;4vvDypki5BGNW82354E5FQ==
X-Spam-Flag: No
X-Sonic-Spam-Details: 0.0/5.0 by cerberusd
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com

On 08/12/2014 05:04 PM, Cirilo Bernardo wrote:

> With regards to CR/LF and the comma, I see no ambiguity at all. CR/LF is
> optional but recommended for human readability, but within any data block
> it may only be placed immediately after a comma.

Well, then that is proof that the spec is ambiguous, because that would 
conflict with some readings of the spec.  You may be correct, but the 
spec is soft.

>
> - Cirilo
>
>