X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:references :mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to :user-agent; bh=A3QZiyNms6xhvISEdcKLleq3Xx80SZf51Z3bO2m3r2o=; b=iygeqzPcBK5/+954zJxQ0EOVFCVZA1cspUSAas0eqBzd5ofddtNsG/i6ZUPcafZU70 sfh/1CacKqKL1Z0uru9NlF35uc4OP2Gzx97tfG7Y6k16jFHf23p1i4kqXkN1tRYfyKnC V/zDIddhJ563MKvu6HlwKGIXt6xm/Qw37wd3103fbxcckVs4xjq6OKAwkJTkisEaM16q hgnJ5ybgN316FE/EBkPvM2iIBCucBruREauLzVZD2ztpMCo65pldANE4tfPR1w5FldUY RdQoO0aJ8xALDWs1XvA2geS1EzryieICk5YHg9VpafccrU2BIUf1jWQdJQeswZjrS+qN 1wTw== X-Received: by 10.152.29.137 with SMTP id k9mr22485204lah.27.1407149856119; Mon, 04 Aug 2014 03:57:36 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2014 14:57:13 +0400 From: Vladimir Zhbanov To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Subject: Re: [geda-user] Pin Type Dialog Message-ID: <20140804105713.GH24580@localhost.localdomain> Mail-Followup-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com References: <399B159D-C237-45F0-947B-90C91E30C7DD AT sbcglobal DOT net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <399B159D-C237-45F0-947B-90C91E30C7DD@sbcglobal.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk On Sun, Aug 03, 2014 at 08:06:26PM -0700, Edward Hennessy wrote: > All, > > When converting the pin type dialog into a non-modal and > instant-apply, it doesn't seem like a single setting should be > in a dialog box by itself. Why not? > Should it be merged into the > color/line type/fill type dialog? If not, what should it be > merged with? I think no. I see no reason to merge pin settings with anything else. Pins have no properties appropriate to other primitives and vice versa.