X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Envelope-From: paubert AT iram DOT es Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2014 19:42:08 +0200 From: Gabriel Paubert To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Subject: Re: [geda-user] pcb: Patch for arcs with different radii for x and y on screen Message-ID: <20140621174208.GA11338@visitor2.iram.es> References: <201406211627 DOT s5LGR0aR004148 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201406211627.s5LGR0aR004148@envy.delorie.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Spamina-Bogosity: Unsure X-Spamina-Spam-Score: -0.2 (/) X-Spamina-Spam-Report: Content analysis details: (-0.2 points) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP 0.8 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60% [score: 0.4903] Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk On Sat, Jun 21, 2014 at 12:27:00PM -0400, DJ Delorie wrote: > > > I "think" if gerber supports them, then getting arbitrary axis > > directions will still be awkward / impossible without approximation. > > Gerber doesn't support them. At least, not reliably across fabs. We > approximate them with line segments. Indeed, I've never used them, but the Gerber specification only describes linear and circular interpolation. And the transformation which allow non uniform scaling are also listed as deprecated. Gabriel