X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type;
        bh=60jYWqSAv61+1y3msU6D5owxM5EpUzCO2GWSTmtwR/g=;
        b=hJoT/pkB63LbZ6oENWf3oR62jZpwFB+BmGbIDmnq/HN1TiJEQeU5uLfjqhrihc0Gnl
         QQ/vxUI2qORj6UGXnzebbjt64Pw+iFWV3Bi90z3KRFrISZoqfbXMJ+qOFA+7U1pOa4kj
         dnWADYoV6k1wHXlrNj6kMGCYf3xQn2ZBzngdoieQm0MX1Ddqp8uFJkHOz3AhLF5uhRx5
         Ho0KXZCIVZ8qAcUJzZj+zstiTLlPn2YvY0LE25UJgcNcUALxJ9vgWW7J6XZF5gr7fpw/
         DGgOTeOBDZWtrae4iBo0jqZCjNBD/A2TqygJ75sNJrhjlYcM/IBJ24Iw2JgygWtBuMdF
         Sp/A==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.60.43.229 with SMTP id z5mr3175646oel.50.1394397613592; Sun,
 09 Mar 2014 13:40:13 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <86CABBE6-EE80-4347-B7AA-3F5A8DA4C658@noqsi.com>
References: <CAG4ve9LgHNoVZoGaGgF67tadJ_n=L6Uy1g=UPPrkM0fL6Rgufw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<20140127234944 DOT 924148045B78 AT turkos DOT aspodata DOT se>
	<CAG4ve9+3jhFJ1Cr6CLUyLX_y02uigJECiUCwxjUWdP=heVocqg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<20140128201110 DOT DF7D78045B78 AT turkos DOT aspodata DOT se>
	<20140129072550 DOT GA24560 AT localhost DOT localdomain>
	<CAG4ve9+v9QxNRaPSFkmGfr6bKsv7km-Gt_gwXF7Eh4TX+AmNug AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<CAOP4iL2JBUdF93kZF-iQ9Rv+VTN3iXoT+6C4LoBi5qaMxof=sA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<CAG4ve9+QsUf=nVXPe-f3VddGiqHn8sjZUJNkdu3QV1cOQDWiAg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<86CABBE6-EE80-4347-B7AA-3F5A8DA4C658 AT noqsi DOT com>
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2014 00:40:13 +0400
Message-ID: <CAG4ve9LX0mYk2a1zpfWJJC=OP5Weq9pt3PF7_Nqx5vX4wpR=Bg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [geda-user] identical symbol names
From: =?KOI8-R?B?4czFy9PFyiDowdLYy8/X08vJyg==?= <svetonomer AT gmail DOT com>
To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11330b886f182b04f4327ed0
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

--001a11330b886f182b04f4327ed0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

> The problem with all these ideas is that they make schematics less
> reusable.
>
Disagree.
Problems depends not on ideas but on their implementation.


> Ideally, the schematic itself should not change from breadboard to
> prototype to engineering model to production, but (at least in my world)
> the parts list changes drastically.
>
:)
So not only you.
In my world this feature exists too.
This is true for all creative people.

> So, for different phases of the project, the symbols change, but the
> schematics don't change unless necessary.
>
Yes.
Need to add a tool to symbol updates (Force update mechanism).
For example to add "Update symbol..." to context menu or to "eU" binding.

--001a11330b886f182b04f4327ed0
Content-Type: text/html; charset=KOI8-R
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr"><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><div class=3D"gmail_quote"><br>=
<blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-=
left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div style=3D"word-wrap:b=
reak-word">
<div class=3D""><div></div></div><div>The problem with all these ideas is t=
hat they make schematics less reusable. </div></div></blockquote><div><span=
 id=3D"result_box" class=3D"" lang=3D"en"><span title=3D"=EE=C5 =D3=CF=C7=
=CC=C1=D3=C5=CE

">Disagree.<br></span></span><span id=3D"result_box" class=3D"" lang=3D"en"=
><span title=3D"=F7=D3=A3 =DA=C1=D7=C9=D3=C9=D4 =CE=C5 =CF=D4 =C9=C4=C5=CA,=
 =C1 =CF=D4 =C9=C8 =D2=C5=C1=CC=C9=DA=C1=C3=C9=C9.

">Problems depends not on ideas but on their implementation.</span></span><=
br></div><div>=9A</div><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0p=
x 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><d=
iv style=3D"word-wrap:break-word">
<div>Ideally, the schematic itself should not change from breadboard to pro=
totype to engineering model to production, but (at least in my world) the p=
arts list changes drastically. </div></div></blockquote><div>:)<br></div>
<div>So not only you. <br></div><div>In my world this feature exists too.<b=
r></div><div><span tabindex=3D"-1" id=3D"result_box" class=3D"" lang=3D"en"=
><span class=3D"">This is true</span> <span class=3D"">for all</span> <span=
 class=3D"">creative people.</span> </span></div>
<blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-=
left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div style=3D"word-wrap:b=
reak-word"><div>So, for different phases of the project, the symbols change=
, but the schematics don&#39;t change unless necessary.</div>
</div></blockquote><div>Yes.<br><span tabindex=3D"-1" id=3D"result_box" cla=
ss=3D"" lang=3D"en"><span class=3D"">Need to</span> <span class=3D"">add a =
tool to</span> <span class=3D"">symbol updates</span></span> (Force update =
mechanism).<br>
</div><div>For example to add &quot;Update symbol...&quot; to context menu =
or to &quot;eU&quot; binding. <br><br></div></div><br></div></div>

--001a11330b886f182b04f4327ed0--