X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Message-ID: <522F9E06.70209@sonic.net> Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2013 15:32:38 -0700 From: Dave Curtis User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121028 Thunderbird/16.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Subject: Re: [geda-user] PCB: why does pin name lettering appear on top & bottom copper Gerber output? References: <522EF85C DOT 1000206 AT envinsci DOT co DOT uk> <201309101628 DOT r8AGSkcs017932 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <522F4D12 DOT 9060303 AT sonic DOT net> <201309101800 DOT r8AI0bjO026724 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <522F9932 DOT 8000500 AT sonic DOT net> <201309102217 DOT r8AMHxCG021213 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> In-Reply-To: <201309102217.r8AMHxCG021213@envy.delorie.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com On 09/10/2013 03:17 PM, DJ Delorie wrote: > I meant, it would make a useless extra "layer" in both postscript and > gerbv that would contain only the pin labels. The benefit of > outputting the pin labels is only really a benefit if the pins are > there too ;-) OK.... well, so I was thinking that in gerbv the user would simply turn on both the pin layer and the pin label layer, and then they are both there to see. For a postscript check plot, the pin and pinlabel can be plotted together as a layer group, correct? >