X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2013 14:59:47 -0400
Message-Id: <201309101859.r8AIxlmY009106@envy.delorie.com>
From: DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com>
To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to: <B5505296-A25B-4E8F-AD61-534C105E4088@noqsi.com> (message from
	John Doty on Tue, 10 Sep 2013 14:46:59 -0400)
Subject: Re: [geda-user] Revert "Reset refdes number to the question mark when parts are copied"
References: <1378645856 DOT 7052 DOT 5 DOT camel AT pcjc2lap> <B1D356C6-26ED-4AA7-80B1-0868110488C8 AT sbcglobal DOT net> <B5505296-A25B-4E8F-AD61-534C105E4088 AT noqsi DOT com>
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


But we should be allowed to duplicate the features of commercial
packages.  The tricky part is knowing which is which.  The really
tricky part is knowing when to break that rule, too.

In this case, though, the problem wasn't "copying a misfeature", I
think it's that what is a feature for one package may be a misfeature
in another, because the paradigms are different.

Let's also be careful about bad-mouthing other packages, please.