X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com From: Peter TB Brett Subject: Re: [geda-user] Thoughts on mechanical CAD interaction... Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2013 06:38:07 +0100 Lines: 37 Message-ID: <87txi7zqkg.fsf@harrington.peter-b.co.uk> References: <1377775142 DOT 15398 DOT 1 DOT camel AT pcjc2lap> <4F0C8F27-B063-44CF-9011-63D2B62F3FD9 AT jump-ing DOT de> <3752e7fd48358f6e97a09d34392997aa AT cam DOT ac DOT uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Complaints-To: usenet AT ger DOT gmane DOT org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: cpc4-oxfd23-2-0-cust628.4-3.cable.virginmedia.com User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:rhOapdSGcIQCf4Jt/Dx9gjAZSqE= Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Markus Hitter writes: > Am 29.08.2013 um 20:57 schrieb Peter C.J. Clifton: > > Bug/feature branches in the official repo are rewritten often anyways, > if just for rebasing them to follow other developments. > Well, they shouldn't be. One of the things that (I thought) all of the gEDA projects were pretty clear about, when we transitioned to git back in 2007, was that the main repositories should provide reliable history. If you want to mess around with rebasing, use a private repo. In the main gEDA repositories, merges should be used to show how other developments are incorporated into branches. Since git makes merges *really easy* I don't feel like it's too much to ask. Peter =2D-=20 Dr Peter Brett --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.14 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlIgL78ACgkQZ7Gbq7g7vpqt1QCfcYq+RBVnvvu5GQdGKQc/Pi8V ooMAnAyzmItUtbWSTEH81aeD2yLNmM++ =vFdF -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--