X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-SourceIP: 89.173.57.57 Message-ID: <51CC6CC3.7080303@prochac.sk> Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2013 18:48:03 +0200 From: Milan Prochac User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130620 Thunderbird/17.0.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Subject: Re: [geda-user] LP699502-openscad-exporter References: <51CA371C DOT 10507 AT prochac DOT sk> <51CBE8B3 DOT 9060701 AT prochac DOT sk> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on gw-milan.doma.local Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com On 27. 6. 2013 14:14, Markus Hitter wrote: > > Am 27.06.2013 um 09:24 schrieb Milan Prochac: > >> On 26. 6. 2013 3:51, Kai-Martin Knaak wrote: >>> Is your exporter available for download somewhere? >> >> Yes, now it is: >> http://static.bastl.sk/pcb/0001-OpenSCAD-export-filter-0.1.patch > > Thanks. Nicely you've choosen a different name, so I could add it on > top of the same feature branch. Using this branch, there's now an > "openscad" and an "scad" exporter. This should allow simple comparison. > >> Regarding models: >> Place all models into /../share/pcb/scad/models/ >> directory. Models should have all dimensions in milimeters, they >> should lie on XY plane with center on Z axis and they should have the >> same orientation as footprint. > > Do you have a few already? Please add them to the repo. An SMD and a > through hole resistor should show on most designs how things are > expected to work. > No, I do not have any real models (just some test models) - I started with OpenSCAD just few days ago, so I had not enough time... I have set of generators for VRML models, I will later modify them and I will use them to generate bunch of standard models. > One thing I've seen: You union full 3D geometry for copper and even > silk. Wouldn't it perform better to union 2D first, then to extrude > that? For silk and solder mask, 2D might be entirely sufficient. > Good idea. I will try to change it. > Anyways, thanks a ton for the work. No documentation, no sample > models, but I could actually see silk and traces of a simple design. > Excellent! > Yes, there is still lot of work to do, including documentation. I will have chance to continue after weekend. Milan > Markus > > - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - > Dipl. Ing. (FH) Markus Hitter > http://www.jump-ing.de/ > > > >