Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v753.1)
In-Reply-To: <51CA371C.10507@prochac.sk>
References: <AD211BF7-2641-4C0D-A8AB-7A39DE239FB0 AT jump-ing DOT de> <51CA371C DOT 10507 AT prochac DOT sk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed
Message-Id: <CEF2BA76-4937-4578-B7EE-BD5770F6E81C@jump-ing.de>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Markus Hitter <mah AT jump-ing DOT de>
Subject: Re: [geda-user] LP699502-openscad-exporter
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2013 04:08:14 +0200
To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


Am 26.06.2013 um 02:34 schrieb Milan Prochac:

> On 25. 6. 2013 18:25, Markus Hitter wrote:
>> I've just pushed Bert Timmermans work on an OpenSCAD exporter into  
>> the central repository, branch LP699502-openscad-exporter.
>>
>
> Hmmm, bad news for me :(

Really?

In case your approach is entirely different, add it as a feature  
branch, too. Then people can decide which one works better.

In case it's a similar approach, put your features on top of Berts!

Nothing is carved in stone and working on a HID is by no means  
limited to one person.

Especially I think exporters should give reasonable results by just  
clicking through the dialog, which I think Bert ones doesn't, yet. In  
todays world, people have a strong tendency to throw a tool away in  
case it doesn't produce results on the first spot, no matter how  
powerful it is with some knowledge.


Markus

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Dipl. Ing. (FH) Markus Hitter
http://www.jump-ing.de/