X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Message-ID: <20130121034737.3686.qmail@stuge.se>
Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2013 04:47:37 +0100
From: Peter Stuge <peter AT stuge DOT se>
To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: [geda-user] Any new geda port for Windows?
Mail-Followup-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
References: <8738y3iigd DOT fsf AT dome DOT home> <kd22k1$vna$1 AT ger DOT gmane DOT org> <20130114231808 DOT 26630 DOT qmail AT stuge DOT se> <kdd2uk$h17$1 AT ger DOT gmane DOT org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <kdd2uk$h17$1@ger.gmane.org>
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

Kai-Martin Knaak wrote:
> > It would be fantastic if the student could get in touch with the
> > project in order to make those builds automated somewhere.
> 
> The build of the binaries is done on DJ's server by automated scripts. 
> The results can be found at 
>    ftp://ftp.delorie.com/pub/geda-windows/snapshots/

Yes, they're a great first step, but they are not the installer.


> Klaus's part of the job is to make the install a one-click experience 
> for the uninitiated windows user.

Right, and I think the project can benefit from that. It would be
nice if Klaus could contribute what he has developed.

I am not suggesting that it be committed as-is, but it would be good
as a starting point for a plain unaffiliated installer, right?


//Peter