X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1085)
Subject: Re: [geda-user] Find rat lines
From: John Doty <jpd AT noqsi DOT com>
In-Reply-To: <201212140119.qBE1JjIP018442@envy.delorie.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2012 02:30:39 -0700
Message-Id: <32237613-4507-420E-97A7-19C5A72C45C0@noqsi.com>
References: <20121204183305 DOT 6b04c0dc AT jive DOT levalinux DOT org> <20121208112649 DOT 388a9d22 AT jive DOT levalinux DOT org> <1355011808 DOT 19390 DOT 8 DOT camel AT localhost> <alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1212090407031 DOT 26605 AT igor2priv> <1355188647 DOT 12937 DOT 14 DOT camel AT localhost> <A7B4EDBD-3704-4837-9350-A16559C60A2A AT noqsi DOT com> <201212140010 DOT qBE0ABjV023762 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <172CCAAB-0423-43EF-8A04-5A9961F1D5B9 AT noqsi DOT com> <201212140119 DOT qBE1JjIP018442 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1085)
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id qBE9Uidj018186
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


On Dec 13, 2012, at 6:19 PM, DJ Delorie wrote:

> 
>> To expand on my confusion, I cannot understand how this could be
>> difficult given that pcb is supposed to create a geometric
>> arrangement of conductors and insulators implementing a netlist. But
>> I find pcb very confusing in general. I cannot actually find in its
>> design the concepts of "conductor", "insulator" and "geometry".
> 
> Your error is in the "is supposed to" assumption.
> 
> The purpose of PCB is to help people design circuit boards.

The purpose of PL/I was to help people write programs. Chaotic, confusing design prevented it from succeeding. It was designed by the smartest people IBM could get. It was still a flop. And C, with its emphasis on cleanly exposing the underlying hardware (*not* so much helping people to write programs), stole PL/I's lunch. Given a simple, comprehensible tool, people figured out how to use it to write programs without all those "helpful" PL/I features.

John Doty              Noqsi Aerospace, Ltd.
http://www.noqsi.com/
jpd AT noqsi DOT com