X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Message-ID: <20120815190638.15362.qmail@stuge.se> Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2012 21:06:38 +0200 From: Peter Stuge To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Subject: Re: [geda-user] Version planning Mail-Followup-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com References: <502A7291 DOT 90206 AT unige DOT ch> <20120815155142 DOT 30385 DOT qmail AT stuge DOT se> <502BEE3D DOT 8050105 AT unige DOT ch> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <502BEE3D.8050105@unige.ch> Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk Juergen Harms wrote: >> Is there any problem with tagging the git tree somewhere in that period? > > - For somebody from outside the geda development community I didn't suggest that you should do it, I asked the question to hear from everyone who has worked with the source code if they see any particular reasons not to just tag a release in the time that fits Mageia. > Re Mageia release cycle: there has been a long and quite violent debate on > that issue, terminated by a council decision to set this period to 9 months > - a compromise value (personally, I was positively surprised by the > demonstration that a community distro can rapidly and efficiently take such > a decision). It's certainly a huge improvement over the Debian cycle! Well done! :) //Peter