X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Message-ID: <50067EA3.4040001@estechnical.co.uk>
Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2012 10:15:15 +0100
From: Ed Simmons <ed AT estechnical DOT co DOT uk>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120615 Thunderbird/13.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: [geda-user] gnetlist: allow net= attributes without a pin number
References: <000301cd644d$75518ab0$5ff4a010$@de> <20120717160113 DOT 2caabc78 AT svelte> <500669D1 DOT 7000206 AT estechnical DOT co DOT uk> <CAJisMU3X=s4YhgKxZsxQ7+Z4Obz=9xuKZjbveU9NL8aLQ482Pg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
In-Reply-To: <CAJisMU3X=s4YhgKxZsxQ7+Z4Obz=9xuKZjbveU9NL8aLQ482Pg@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Authenticated-As: ed AT estechnical DOT co DOT uk
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com

On 18/07/12 08:58, Krzysztof Kościuszkiewicz wrote:
> This has been discussed several times.
> The consensus was that hacking this as a special case is frowned upon.
>
> References:
> http://old.nabble.com/gEDA-user:-Attribute-Net-(without-pin-assignment)---for-Power-and-Port-Symbols-td31365921.html
> http://old.nabble.com/gEDA-user%3A-gschem%3A-net-attribute-for-power-I-O,-clean-appearance--(no-“%3A1”)-tc31102453.html
In that case, sorry for the noise, I missed the first time this was 
discussed.

I'd happily help with some of the alternatives though, if there was 
general consensus on the path to choose.

Best,
Ed