X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2012 12:25:23 -0400
Message-Id: <201203201625.q2KGPNAV008105@envy.delorie.com>
From: DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com>
To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to: <1332246519.2657.14.camel@AMD64X2.fritz.box> (message from Stefan
	Salewski on Tue, 20 Mar 2012 13:28:39 +0100)
Subject: Re: [geda-user] Pollution of gedasymbols
References: <1332246519 DOT 2657 DOT 14 DOT camel AT AMD64X2 DOT fritz DOT box>
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


> Is it really a good idea to put ALL your symbols and footprints to
> gedasymbols, resulting in names like 

The gedasymbols policy is intentionally unrestrictive in order to get
the most community involvement.  It's up to the users to decide which
users provide the best content, I'm not going to police it.