X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f X-Recipient: djgpp AT delorie DOT com X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yandex.ru; s=mail; t=1566142302; bh=MsTDpdx6c4ub8Ma461NLNOw7iNpd0nIphPcmYMBHVYE=; h=In-Reply-To:From:Date:References:To:Subject:Message-ID; b=bjRlvVVHWzn56nBZxqdTfOXgGhKxzT45omDx3bI72WhotCp8cZ7oXu9rOfnimRNAK eBLLrruSK5U9CadzuULvy56CjKkWY2MO1qAoEWwMHemaaKAuCcPJekZWqBsYl0kMIW WpkNZ0cC9gcoriNRORCi7lVnxdE+7stxSHgPf2z4= Authentication-Results: mxback20g.mail.yandex.net; dkim=pass header.i=@yandex.ru Subject: Re: [PATCH] exec: fix inversions in leak detection logic To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com References: <964e3268-2f75-ee73-ab5a-b01bf1aadb98 AT yandex DOT ru> <7551dfde-01be-7633-3d12-aab8533b66c7 AT yandex DOT ru> <83pnl2muf0 DOT fsf AT gnu DOT org> <83lfvqmt4i DOT fsf AT gnu DOT org> From: "stsp (stsp2 AT yandex DOT ru) [via djgpp AT delorie DOT com]" Message-ID: Date: Sun, 18 Aug 2019 18:31:41 +0300 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.6.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <83lfvqmt4i.fsf@gnu.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-MW Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id x7IFWKua016476 Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: djgpp AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk 18.08.2019 17:43, Eli Zaretskii (eliz AT gnu DOT org) [via djgpp AT delorie DOT com] пишет: >> From: "stsp (stsp2 AT yandex DOT ru) [via djgpp AT delorie DOT com]" >> Date: Sun, 18 Aug 2019 17:29:52 +0300 >> >> 18.08.2019 17:15, Eli Zaretskii (eliz AT gnu DOT org) [via djgpp AT delorie DOT com] >> пишет: >>>> From: Rod Pemberton >>>> Date: Sat, 17 Aug 2019 21:17:31 -0400 >>>> >>>> Anyway, this issue probably best reviewed by Eli or Charles. >>> Charles, I hope (CC'ed). I admit that I forgot these details years >>> ago. >> That patch was absoleted, I sent a new one. > I'm sure Charles will read the entire discussion (if he is available). He is not, I've got a mail delivery failures. In either case, the new patch is much less controversial: http://www.delorie.com/djgpp/mail-archives/browse.cgi?p=djgpp/2019/08/17/21:43:14 While I am sure the code in question should be simplified and be made conditional only on known-buggy DPMI servers, I instead just added the controling flag. Should be quite simple to review by everyone.