X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f From: "Wiktor S." Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp Subject: Re: LUA compiled for DJGPP Date: Tue, 17 May 2011 00:20:44 -0700 (PDT) Organization: http://groups.google.com Lines: 14 Message-ID: References: <5f52ece5-b7bd-4261-ad69-244ff0583e03 AT z13g2000yqg DOT googlegroups DOT com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 78.133.233.211 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: posting.google.com 1305616844 24015 127.0.0.1 (17 May 2011 07:20:44 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse AT google DOT com NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 17 May 2011 07:20:44 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse AT google DOT com Injection-Info: y12g2000yqh.googlegroups.com; posting-host=78.133.233.211; posting-account=y_DuugoAAAD0YVwAVBYww4MsnPE9qCPg User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-Via: 1.0 proxy (squid/3.0.STABLE8) X-HTTP-UserAgent: Opera/9.80 (Windows NT 5.1; U; pl) Presto/2.8.131 Version/11.10,gzip(gfe) Bytes: 1711 To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com > And here's the real point: =A0thanks, but it's already been > done! =A0 :-)) =A0 Juan compiled and packaged it around Christmas time. > Hmmm, forgot it was "/beta/" only (due to DXE3), perhaps that's what > you meant, package it up for "/current/" also?? So this is why I haven't found it and decided to compile it myself ;-) I don't really know what are the differences between /current and / beta builds. Is the beta stable enough to be used? Which is recommended? -- Azarien