X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f
From: Hans-Bernhard Broeker <broeker AT physik DOT rwth-aachen DOT de>
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: PLEASE EXPLAIN v2.953
Date: 19 Dec 2004 19:38:17 GMT
Lines: 25
Message-ID: <32m3l9F3o0ureU1@news.dfncis.de>
References: <4tg7s0182f12t4dlbri2pdq2uqq6ausos7 AT 4ax DOT com> <32jv9hF3ldm8cU4 AT news DOT dfncis DOT de> <ni9bs09vhmlefb5h3djvjr9b147vt9jf4e AT 4ax DOT com>
X-Trace: news.dfncis.de W04kNoQ/9Cl+tcJGnTsJ8gm/jihWKgGergX8IKwh1EtFdfFfOzNxCIs4Es
X-Orig-Path: not-for-mail
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com

Radical NetSurfer <RadSurfer AT yahoo DOT com> wrote:

> %U  and %D mentioned in libc.txt (or libc.info)
> when it is actually flagged as a non-existing entity...

Because you're looking at inforrmation from two separate sources: GCC
only knows about standard C printf format specifiers, which don't
include %D or %U.  Those are non-standard extension which you should
not use.

> What is/was the purpose of %D, %U ?

Compatibility with ancient source code.

> What I did was to attempt to convert those *.info
> files into a more useful *.txt files (that was done long ago),

Wrong plan.  .info files are actually a whole lot *more* useful than
raw ASCII text files can ever be.  You've managed to throw a way a lot
of useful structure in the file which its authors created for your
usage efficiency.

-- 
Hans-Bernhard Broeker (broeker AT physik DOT rwth-aachen DOT de)
Even if all the snow were burnt, ashes would remain.