X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f X-Trace-PostClient-IP: 68.147.131.211 From: Brian Inglis Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp Subject: Re: cwsdpmi on Windows Organization: Systematic Software Message-ID: <17mqh0h1keeu0msh6k92spv4cdv0ssifv5@4ax.com> References: <1092438343 DOT 550905 AT proxy2 DOT srv DOT ualberta DOT ca> X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.93/32.576 English (American) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Lines: 23 Date: Sat, 14 Aug 2004 00:16:03 GMT NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.71.223.147 X-Complaints-To: abuse AT shaw DOT ca X-Trace: pd7tw2no 1092442563 24.71.223.147 (Fri, 13 Aug 2004 18:16:03 MDT) NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2004 18:16:03 MDT To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com On Fri, 13 Aug 2004 17:06:54 -0600 in comp.os.msdos.djgpp, "John Hanley" wrote: >I was wondering if cwsdpmi needs to be present when running an executable on >DOS under Windows? I developed the program on PC-DOS 6.3. > >Also, will EMM386 interfere at all with cwsdpmi? And I assume HIMEM.SYS >should be set. > >I am not too certain of the overall differences between DOS and DOS under >Windows. You shouldn't need anything, as long as you are running in a DOS VM under Windows, DPMI 0.9 is automatically supported by Windows. To run under standalone DOS without Windows running, you need a DPMI memory manager, and whatever that memory manager requires. -- Thanks. Take care, Brian Inglis Calgary, Alberta, Canada Brian DOT Inglis AT CSi DOT com (Brian dot Inglis at SystematicSw dot ab dot ca) fake address use address above to reply