X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f Message-ID: <40EE6F7B.5090502@012.net.il> Date: Fri, 09 Jul 2004 12:12:11 +0200 From: alexbodn User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win98; he-IL; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040113 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en, he MIME-Version: 1.0 To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com Subject: Re: Official Recommended/Preferred DOS distribution for DJGPP? References: <354933d6 DOT 0406300811 DOT 5b829b2a AT posting DOT google DOT com> <2l6h8sF904a1U3 AT uni-berlin DOT de> In-Reply-To: <2l6h8sF904a1U3@uni-berlin.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com >>I would like to know the official recommended/preferred DOS >>distribution that will work best with DJGPP. >> >> > > > >>So far, the major distributions available are: >>- FreeDOS (Open Source) >>- DR DOS (Commercial license from SCO for embedded use?) >>- OpenDOS (Appears to be no longer developed and have merged with DR >>DOS) >>- RX DOS (Open Source) >>- PC DOS (Commercial) >> >> > > > >>Any comment? >> >> > > > >>--- >>Goh, Yong-Kwang >>Singapore >> >> > >I don't know about what will work best with DJGPP, but in terms of active >development, FreeDOS would seem to be the first choice, with no commercial >strings. They even have an emailing list. > >OpenDOS was a version of DR-DOS before Caldera changed the name back to DR-DOS. > >Tom > > > > after a few weeks of efforts to set up a djgpp environment on a new computer, i came up to the following conclusions: under freedos, i have experienced various i/o failures, especially with the more advanced features, like fat32, disk caching and lfn. under drdos, i could not use those most advanced features, but the infrastructure seems to be more stable. extended memory support is very limited, so i am using qemm. the command interpreter is also a little buggy, but could be replaced by bash. the most reliable dos version i have used with djgpp is, i have to admit, msdos 6.22. msdos that comes with windows 95 and 98 has built in dpmi, which does poor memory protection, as compared to cwsdpmi. as a free software developper, i'm using drdos 7.03 on a fat16 disk, no doslfn, , with qemm, ramdrive, but no disk cache, since nwcache, that comes with drdos, is generating some file locating errors. hope to be helpful, alex