X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f From: gswork AT mailcity DOT com (gswork) Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp Subject: Re: what are you running djgpp on? Date: 23 Mar 2004 06:14:19 -0800 Organization: http://groups.google.com Lines: 19 Message-ID: <81f33a98.0403230614.615ebdab@posting.google.com> References: <81f33a98 DOT 0403220228 DOT 76b111a9 AT posting DOT google DOT com> <405EEF97 DOT A98A123E AT yahoo DOT com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 194.128.229.253 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: posting.google.com 1080051260 6859 127.0.0.1 (23 Mar 2004 14:14:20 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse AT google DOT com NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2004 14:14:20 +0000 (UTC) To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com CBFalconer wrote in message news:<405EEF97 DOT A98A123E AT yahoo DOT com>... > gswork wrote: > > > > Just a question out of interest - what spec pc are you running DJGPP > > on? > > > > no big point here, just a nod of appreciation to the scalable and > > useful DJGPP package, and wondering if anyone has it on an even more > > modest machine - and what you've been writing with it recently. > > A '486-DX2-80 running W98 with 64 MB. That particular 486 is considered quite a rare CPU IIRC. I haven't encountered a 486 with so much RAM either. The RAM must make W98 tolerable, but i admit i'd not generally consider having 9x on anything less than a pentium - not so much for the OS, which can go along ok, but for the 32 bit Windows apps.