Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2003 09:57:25 +0200
From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT elta DOT co DOT il>
Sender: halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Message-Id: <8582-Tue18Mar2003095725+0200-eliz@elta.co.il>
X-Mailer: emacs 21.3.50 (via feedmail 8 I) and Blat ver 1.8.9
In-reply-to: <b56jec$8n5$1@narses.hrz.tu-chemnitz.de> (message from
	=?iso-8859-1?Q?Andr=E9_P=F6nitz?= on 18 Mar 2003 07:55:56 GMT)
Subject: Re: gcc -O3 & gprof
References: <b54db9$252aq3$1 AT ID-79865 DOT news DOT dfncis DOT de> <Oejda.183$Zf2 DOT 42 AT read3 DOT inet DOT fi> <b568o6$258tun$1 AT ID-79865 DOT news DOT dfncis DOT de> <b56jec$8n5$1 AT narses DOT hrz DOT tu-chemnitz DOT de>
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

> From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Andr=E9_P=F6nitz?= <poenitz AT gmx DOT net>
> Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp,gnu.gcc.help,gnu.utils.help
> Date: 18 Mar 2003 07:55:56 GMT
> 
> > For instance, nm doesn't distinguish -O0, -O1, -O2, -O3.
> 
> The function definitions have to be there in case you want to access them
> from another translation unit.

I think the symbols are there also if some code, even in the same
translation unit, needs to call one of these functions via a pointer.