From: "Ilya P. Ryzhenkov" <ilya AT spy DOT isp DOT nsc DOT ru>
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: Is djgpp better than Watcom C?
Date: Sun, 27 Oct 1996 14:48:35 -0800
Organization: Institute of Semiconductor Physics
Lines: 32
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <3273E6C3.48D3@spy.isp.nsc.ru>
References: <Pine DOT LNX DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 961018104724 DOT 3677A-100000 AT aditya DOT unigoa DOT ernet DOT in> <1996Oct24 DOT 103643 DOT 5298 AT news> <32713240 DOT 5DC2AC75 AT mercury DOT execulink DOT com>
Reply-To: ilya AT spy DOT isp DOT nsc DOT ru
NNTP-Posting-Host: arab.isp.nsc.ru
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp

Jeff Weeks wrote:
> 
> > >> >Advantage djgpp: fastest-growing Dos compiler around.
> > >> >For the rest they're pretty much the same.
> > >>
> > >> Result:
> > >>    DJGPP    WATCOM
> > >>      1   :    0
> >
> > DOOM was compiled with Watcom, QUAKE with DJGPP...
> 
> And DJGPP programs are very easily ported to UNIX!  A very big plus in
> my books!
> 
> Results:
> DJGPP  WATCOM
>   3      0
> 
> Looks like DJGPP wins :)
> 
> Jeff
Wow ! Poor Watcom ! I HAVE to say something to increase Watcom score ;-)
You see, I was using Watcom for a long time ... I must ... Oh, what can
I say ? Hmmm...
Yes! I've got it !
Watcom has IDE for Windows and OS/2 !
So ...
 Results:
 DJGPP  WATCOM
   3      1

			- Ilya