X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f
From: "Rod Pemberton" <fork AT lllljunkqwer DOT cpm>
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: ANNOUNCE: DJGPP 2.05 beta 1
Date: Wed, 20 May 2015 07:27:48 -0400
Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server
Lines: 33
Message-ID: <op.xyxl4mlwwhxjl4@localhost>
References: <201505042003 DOT t44K3odg011007 AT delorie DOT com>
 <555870E8 DOT 7040302 AT iki DOT fi>
 <CAA2C=vDhD6BJj89o1i0FRd2U0H4bTpGGN4zH6qs7FJKxzqhuQg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
 <201505180114 DOT t4I1EiaX017288 AT delorie DOT com>
 <CAA2C=vCyrQ_+Yq6XsRD-UO4r=j9WoGGiXoqQFrkbiEQpzX+=MA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
 <201505181216 DOT t4ICGaKO014123 AT delorie DOT com>
 <CAA2C=vCk5MY74z+HNVzzdLByg71Y_9ObK-1jPxJ_KF8eqRDZMQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
 <83zj52dkns DOT fsf AT gnu DOT org>
 <CAA2C=vAPcN+MKC_2tcZqVmo9gvF2Cxdo+K+-qfKaNrQuCkMnEw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
 <83wq05eukk DOT fsf AT gnu DOT org>
 <CAA2C=vBKihqvw152LsGvWEiSei7TczN6Vmxsvebtnoz_E5=u4g AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
 <83twv9espx DOT fsf AT gnu DOT org>
 <CAA2C=vC8ge-O+yDkTeXf351E+bpURkxOGmvdp19JTMnCjfkZbA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
 <83siater66 DOT fsf AT gnu DOT org> <op DOT xyvgdewswhxjl4 AT localhost>
 <201505191705 DOT t4JH57E8010700 AT delorie DOT com> <op DOT xywkn8yjwhxjl4 AT localhost>
 <cs1r7pFll16U1 AT mid DOT dfncis DOT de> <op DOT xywngul5whxjl4 AT localhost>
 <CAB9Rao-caWiazYYA53+HZGM9rwS8oeSjqCKGfGMauED98SeYCA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: n4wpt9zq8xR26Ttf9mo2BA.user.speranza.aioe.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed; delsp=yes
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Complaints-To: abuse AT aioe DOT org
User-Agent: Opera Mail/12.16 (Linux)
X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2
Bytes: 2751
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com

On Tue, 19 May 2015 19:30:03 -0400, Louis Santillan (lpsantil AT gmail DOT com)  
<djgpp AT delorie DOT com> wrote:

> See [0].  DJ is not an initialism, AFAIK.

That's not the point.

> As such, D.J. is not correct.

No, "DJ" is not correct according to English rules.  This was
stated previously.  Did you even read the thread?

As such, he has no right to hold others accountable to it
when they're unaware his name doesn't follow English rules.
That's the point.  That's what he was attempting to do.
That's wrong.  He blamed me for the faults with his name.

> Dj is not correct because his parents did not spell his name
> that way in naming him.

The point was that if he doesn't want people to think his name
is abbreviated first and second initial, then he shouldn't
capitalize both.  That's not hard to understand.  This was
also already stated previously.  Did you even read the thread?

If you read the thread, please stop responding as if you hadn't.


Rod Pemberton

-- 
If fewer guns reduced murders, how does one explain
Moscow, Chicago, New York, and South Africa?