X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f
From: Rugxulo <rugxulo AT gmail DOT com>
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: [cyd AT stupidchicken DOT com: Emacs 23.1.91 pretest]
Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2009 11:31:42 -0800 (PST)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 28
Message-ID: <13650ca6-9404-4ad7-bfc0-af9d64db7510@m3g2000yqf.googlegroups.com>
References: <83ws03ezo5 DOT fsf AT gnu DOT org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 65.13.115.246
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1262287902 14099 127.0.0.1 (31 Dec 2009 19:31:42 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse AT google DOT com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2009 19:31:42 +0000 (UTC)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse AT google DOT com
Injection-Info: m3g2000yqf.googlegroups.com; posting-host=65.13.115.246; 
	posting-account=p5rsXQoAAAB8KPnVlgg9E_vlm2dvVhfO
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US) 
	AppleWebKit/532.0 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/3.0.195.38 Safari/532.0,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
Bytes: 2261
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com

Hi,

On Dec 31, 1:00=A0pm, Eli Zaretskii <e DOT  DOT  DOT  AT gnu DOT org> wrote:
>
> Emacs 23.2 is in pretest, see below. =A0The latest version 23.1.91 just
> built on my XPSP2 box.

If my XP machine wasn't on the fritz, I'd be all over this. So I may
not be too helpful in building this for a while.

> Please give it a try and report any unusual findings.

What's new exactly? IIRC, not much was planned for 23.2, at least
nothing that mattered to DOS much (lexical binding branch?? Mac OS X
port??).

BTW, we still don't even have an official 23.1 package for DJGPP yet.
I know you're extremely busy, so I definitely don't expect you to do
it. Heck, I've even considered making them myself, but I don't have
any timeframe planned.

> I'm especially interested in reports, whether success or failure,
> about building and using on plain DOS or its clones (as opposed to
> Windows).

I guess I could build it in FreeDOS. However, to be honest, I'm in no
hurry at the moment to try that. Several other minor things on the
brain. But nag me if you really need me.   ;-)