X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f From: Rugxulo Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp Subject: Re: Will DJGPP work with PTS-DOS 32? Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 07:46:40 -0700 (PDT) Organization: http://groups.google.com Lines: 37 Message-ID: References: <6424d8cb-e2c5-4c32-a7d4-1d539410256a AT q11g2000yqh DOT googlegroups DOT com> <8ac1568f-6df3-46ea-b4be-59257249439c AT c36g2000yqn DOT googlegroups DOT com> <111c7d14-ea1b-4649-866a-6b216f6c651b AT h5g2000yqh DOT googlegroups DOT com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 65.13.115.246 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: posting.google.com 1237474000 31924 127.0.0.1 (19 Mar 2009 14:46:40 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse AT google DOT com NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 14:46:40 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse AT google DOT com Injection-Info: p11g2000yqe.googlegroups.com; posting-host=65.13.115.246; posting-account=p5rsXQoAAAB8KPnVlgg9E_vlm2dvVhfO User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Opera/9.64 (Windows NT 6.0; U; en) Presto/2.1.1,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com Hi, On Mar 19, 8:31=A0am, themouse wrote: > > I got no response on the freedos news group and I posted one message > to the user > list and didn't get a response. Way back in the day when linux was > hard > to install I got flamed pretty bad, I'm still gun shy about posting. > LOL. FreeDOS guys are just busy, I guess. Sad, really, they need more volunteers. > My problem was I forgot to mark the partition as active. > Now its installed but boots to a blank screen. > I tried to install linux. I got Puppy to boot. > I installed it just fine, the difference I "think" is that grub was > installed as a boot loader. > I'm going to start over tonight and use a bootloader with FreeDos and > see. fdisk - create a FAT partition, mark as active, reboot format - make readable by DOS sys c: - adds boot sector, kernel.sys, command.com I don't think Linux is really any easier now (esp. when UMSDOS isn't supported by the 2.6.x series). Then again, nothing is. > I'm getting it, its a good thing I'm stubborn. LOL > Till then I will use QEMU. which is ok for poking through code, > but prob not a great place to build a xwindows ish desktop > for dos. QEMU is good, just not as fast as you'd like. In particular, I don't think compiling there is such a good idea. But feel free to suffer^H^H^H^H try anyways. ;-)