X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f From: Rugxulo Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp Subject: Re: Dos programming Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 22:48:05 -0700 (PDT) Organization: http://groups.google.com Lines: 31 Message-ID: <4f7b4d8f-fa46-43d0-813f-1f37466aa3ce@v38g2000yqb.googlegroups.com> References: <06c3c085-f8d3-497f-8f68-3db8518f7938 AT e18g2000yqo DOT googlegroups DOT com> <6ecec264-3874-47ef-b9d7-406f29d72679 AT s20g2000yqh DOT googlegroups DOT com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 65.13.115.246 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: posting.google.com 1237441687 25489 127.0.0.1 (19 Mar 2009 05:48:07 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse AT google DOT com NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 05:48:07 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse AT google DOT com Injection-Info: v38g2000yqb.googlegroups.com; posting-host=65.13.115.246; posting-account=p5rsXQoAAAB8KPnVlgg9E_vlm2dvVhfO User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Opera/9.64 (Windows NT 6.0; U; en) Presto/2.1.1,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com Hi, On Mar 18, 3:01=A0am, "Rod Pemberton" wrote: > "Rugxulo" wrote in message > > news:6ecec264-3874-47ef-b9d7-406f29d72679 AT s20g2000yqh DOT googlegroups DOT com... > > > Well, at the risk of overwhelming you, here's some more: > > Ok. Well, if he just wanted to browse through collections of old DOS code > packages, there are more links: > > ftp://ftp.funet.fi/pub/http://www.zcu.cz/ftp/http://hobbes.nmsu.edu/http:= //www.os2bbs.com/Download/index.htmlhttp://www.digsys.bg/simtel.net/msdos/i= ndex-msdos.htmlhttp://archives.thebbs.org/http://www.math.utah.edu/pub/http= ://sac-ftp.externet.hu > > ;) Rod, I trust your experience here. So I'm sure you're aware that Simtel lacks much (or is outdated) making it not too useful anymore. Most OS/2 sites (even Hobbes) lack some current stuff, and what is there (even EMX-compiled) doesn't usually work in DOS. And SAC mirrors are good (now), but I've had to send a billion e-mails for a billion files just because they were heavily outdated (and still need to check again one of these days since I've not had time for e-mailing them recently.) In short, it's easy to say, "No one uses it or no one cares", but that's a fallacy, you just have to know where to look!! (Feel free to ask, I have spent some time on this.)