From: Charles Sandmann <sandmann AT clio DOT rice DOT edu>
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: ANNOUNCE: RHIDE 1.5
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2003 18:08:09 CST
Organization: Rice University, Houston TX
Lines: 10
Message-ID: <3e52cae9.sandmann@clio.rice.edu>
References: <dP72a.45469$jM5 DOT 114036 AT newsfeeds DOT bigpond DOT com> <3e491127 DOT sandmann AT clio DOT rice DOT edu> <3E529A14 DOT 7F493AF5 AT yahoo DOT com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: clio.rice.edu
X-Trace: joe.rice.edu 1045613309 8905 128.42.105.3 (19 Feb 2003 00:08:29 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: abuse AT rice DOT edu
NNTP-Posting-Date: 19 Feb 2003 00:08:29 GMT
X-NewsEditor: ED-1.5.9
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com

> > Unless you are using an entire CVS/test system from Andrew's build,
> > you already have mixed version binaries.

> No, what I mean is I am using gcc 3.2.1 here, so the new release
> of rhide would generate different binaries, have less C99
> abilities, confuse me even more, etc.

Since RHIDE calls the compiler (gcc 3.2.1), it would generate the 
exact same binaries.  I can't help about the confusion :-)