Date: Fri, 05 Jan 2001 12:13:14 +0200
From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Sender: halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Message-Id: <2593-Fri05Jan2001121313+0200-eliz@is.elta.co.il>
X-Mailer: Emacs 20.6 (via feedmail 8.3.emacs20_6 I) and Blat ver 1.8.6
In-reply-to: <932u4l$908tn$1@ID-57378.news.dfncis.de>
	(dummy_addressee AT hotmail DOT com)
Subject: Re: either I'm stupid or GCC once again has random behaviour
References: <Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 1010103105923 DOT 1129Q-100000 AT is> <92uvkq$88kpu$1 AT ID-57378 DOT news DOT dfncis DOT de> <92vl25$q9u$1 AT news DOT luth DOT se> <932f9m$8hcs3$1 AT ID-57378 DOT news DOT dfncis DOT de> <932fii$4j2$1 AT news DOT luth DOT se> <932ggh$8h5r3$1 AT ID-57378 DOT news DOT dfncis DOT de> <200101041854 DOT NAA24279 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <932ou0$8t8ce$1 AT ID-57378 DOT news DOT dfncis DOT de> <2561-Thu04Jan2001235404+0200-eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il> <932u4l$908tn$1 AT ID-57378 DOT news DOT dfncis DOT de>
Note-from-DJ: This may be spam
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

> From: "Alexei A. Frounze" <dummy_addressee AT hotmail DOT com>
> Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
> Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2001 17:41:06 -0500
> 
> Why the h***  "h***" is filtered out but g0d is n0t? Isn't this a
> discrimination after all? why g0d is better and less offensive than h***? is
> there a proof? Btw, if we have a word which assumes existance of the
> opposite meaning, we can suppress use of either of these words.

That's a wrong attitude.  Please accept that it is offensive as an
axiom, and refrain from using it.  DJ's spam filter is very good, it
is constantly improved and maintained, and chances that it will be
changed given questions of the ``why not?'' type are less than slim.

There's enough ways to express anything you want without using this,
or other similar words.

Morover, when you choose words carefully, you might also find a better
way of saying what you need to tell.

> You know, when a parent doesn't buy to his/her child an expensive toy it can
> be treatead (from child's point of view) as an insult and can be carried out
> without much saying about it. :)

How many children do you have?  That's not how _my_ kids react when I
don't buy them something they want.