From: "taxman." <taxman10m AT mediaone DOT net>
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
References: <199901031437 DOT JAA05213 AT delorie DOT com>
Subject: Re: djgpp and windows2000
Lines: 17
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.0810.800
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.0810.800
Message-ID: <jBRj2.6465$qF5.13189065@lwnws01.ne.mediaone.net>
Date: Sun, 3 Jan 1999 16:45:02 -0500
NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.128.10.205
X-Trace: lwnws01.ne.mediaone.net 915400143 24.128.10.205 (Sun, 03 Jan 1999 16:49:03 EDT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 03 Jan 1999 16:49:03 EDT
Organization: Northeast Region--MediaOne
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com

If you travel over to the Win2000 product page on www.micrisoft.com/windows/
it looks like they actually increased support for DOS.  Whoever got the info
that it doesn't support DOS was wrong.

<dinggoum AT 163 DOT net> wrote in message
news:199901031437 DOT JAA05213 AT delorie DOT com...
>What is MS's exact meaning about that W2K will not support dos?
>
>(a)  needn't  dos  , run dos program as well as win9x .
>(b)  can't boot from dos , run dos program well .
>(c)  run dos program like in NT console .
>(d)  can't use anything about dos .
>
>What can we do to let MS know that it's a wrong way
>if the answer is (d)?