Xref: news2.mv.net comp.os.msdos.djgpp:7731 From: Erik Max Francis Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp Subject: Re: Need info QuakeC and djgpp relationship -- for debug etc Date: Tue, 20 Aug 1996 19:43:29 -0700 Organization: Alcyone Systems Lines: 22 Message-ID: <321A77D1.5EBE269A@alcyone.com> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: annex-p140.meer.net Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp Eli Zaretskii wrote: > On Sun, 18 Aug 1996, stephen benson wrote: > > > It's quite a while since I used djgpp, but I was looking at the dos > > version of QuakeC which (initial impression) appears to be a modified > > djgpp. > > Not modified DJGPP, just DJGPP, the same everybody uses. Of course, lots > of code in Quake is written in assembly, but the tools are the same you > get from the DJGPP archives. He's not asking about Quake itself, he's asking about QuakeC, the language that is used for the definition of objects and their relations to one another in Quake. The question was whether or not QuakeC is a modified DJGPP. (I don't know the answer either; I was hoping someone else did.) -- Erik Max Francis, &tSftDotIotE http://www.alcyone.com/max/ max AT alcyone DOT com San Jose, California ICBM 37 20 07 N 121 53 38 W R^4: the 4th R is respect War's a game which were their subjects wise/Kings would not play at. -- Cowper