X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
	h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:references
	:mime-version:content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding
	:in-reply-to:user-agent;
	bh=VA0xET6v0MzcWCZhTxsJ/5JsYaBfxGgluUvu305MhiM=;
	b=eW6erRzKJdhAfc6jkT37s9ANil4+cj7p9j7NZk0Wiwe/8KFGzKHmdecgyJ+nt0QdDB
	nzQm9klJZQ7MIcFx9oxn2zU2IctPZIWwC74ZKq8XmoDKwntZvgdeQTVXS11/o4UDM/Ki
	SyWFvpxK2Nldhxds4MozHkyojZkhlb0r+5zGeUqCzBTx8ghxpX1wf0OJM31Bku3AXcT+
	C8aWCQaR/tV4sVB3A54ZWtdjU3DNsZg9SchvZSKzkje5oNJ9OzePyvbcLSUKc4YaeYSb
	wg/v8huqVF1EzM9UfszfjD1hw5RfCm0stVWEd/EnXkTmu7LfpSHFxy5gdL2lxwa0uVYr
	gDxA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
	h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to
	:references:mime-version:content-disposition
	:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:user-agent;
	bh=VA0xET6v0MzcWCZhTxsJ/5JsYaBfxGgluUvu305MhiM=;
	b=qSqxXeYFDhB/+fRyhTDoTv0EB2ud1xFvx0hCEZvN3BfbmYOzhKNSFb4N9up6hau0hU
	ydsMsIC13eIPa9NcvvCwpl0WOmhFmvthbDaEyyenTwMesnNHMae57ET14kiMjAdUoO5R
	dsn0Wrs9qHjOfbTTm8hkY3b88fT6Yc1T8ZhNtRLm2sd6vmVkpIo8qmOKaPhdd8od6fBJ
	EdiMqsZvYjRFu3MyOviC2WjJn6MG/N0tqWq/mQ8rzbPEX2nBrnLNFArYZHeBqVZcqela
	NO8kIl29vpYT//JY4MPeE7aipJIsA3DdQU2earL7NggRHTFIvmkFQ1BPhdLgi5xrlceQ
	ZBlA==
X-Gm-Message-State:	AOAM533b+kDKsVax0IZQ8hqTjcYSfmaapsTGCMJ0ZGpFX9HH/SJNLWcE
	36XlzEdXNjy89mKMUiGKnMLpnDDWTkk=
X-Google-Smtp-Source:	ABdhPJw4oAy8VCQOAkTTRvFQlvf3d6LdBxMYNy1oSvDccPzBB4HLrZc0hnBM21JRBpk2AGgJkTVKNQ==
X-Received:	by 2002:ac2:4307:: with SMTP id l7mr15065592lfh.304.1609003448797;
	Sat, 26 Dec 2020 09:24:08 -0800 (PST)
Date:	Sat, 26 Dec 2020 20:23:36 +0300
From:	"Vladimir Zhbanov (vzhbanov AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] Problem with Guile 2.2.4 dependency for gEDA 1.10.1.
Message-ID:	<20201226172336.GA1299@newvzh.lokolhoz>
Mail-Followup-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
References:	<f5ab1b6f-dbf3-4be3-a43f-eb74b32b7a51 AT fastmail DOT com>
	<alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 21 DOT 2012190043450 DOT 7556 AT nimbus>
	<alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 21 DOT 2012191400380 DOT 24569 AT nimbus>
	<7cd2efb5-177d-05b9-ecd7-433750537790 AT fastmail DOT com>
	<20201221003057 DOT 08aca882 AT swips DOT iqo DOT uni-hannover DOT de>
	<20201221004804 DOT 5809 DOT qmail AT stuge DOT se>
	<20201221025620 DOT 5cd21bf5 AT swips DOT iqo DOT uni-hannover DOT de>
	<28a1b47f-13b3-9452-99ff-dce5d8c2a1e5 AT fastmail DOT com>
	<20201222095015 DOT GA3607 AT newvzh DOT lokolhoz>
	<alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 21 DOT 2012221935540 DOT 10093 AT nimbus>
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<alpine.DEB.2.21.2012221935540.10093@nimbus>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Note-from-DJ:	This may be spam
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Tue, Dec 22, 2020 at 08:18:28PM +0100, Roland Lutz wrote:
...
> > some of our contributions get to geda-gaf, ask Roland ;-)
> 
> Since you keep bringing this up, let me give a comprehensive list of changes
> in lepton-eda which were applied to gEDA/gaf:
> 
>   fe23971 is a Guile-related bugfix (by Peter TB Brett)
>   83e8336 adds Guile 2.2 to the configure script (by Vladimir Zhbanov)
>   490bf1f un-deprecates two functions (by Peter TB Brett)
> 
> These are three commits which, in total, add 21 and remove 6 lines of code,
> or in other words, 0.01% of the changes in gEDA/gaf 1.10.0.  I chose to
> cherry-pick them instead of just re-implementing the gist because I think
> crediting them in this way is a sign of respect towards the developers who
> figured out how to solve this in the first place.  By the way, the patch by
> dmn you mentioned some time ago (de98989) relates to libxornstorage which
> you didn't even bother forking.
> 
> In short, the concept that I'd copied anything from lepton-eda is blatantly
> wrong.

I thought as much.  Not anything, sure, you've got me wrong ;-)

-- 
  Vladimir

(λ)επτόν EDA — https://github.com/lepton-eda

- Raw text -