X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Date:	Thu, 15 Sep 2016 14:02:26 +0200 (CEST)
From:	Roland Lutz <rlutz AT hedmen DOT org>
To:	"Vladimir Zhbanov (vzhbanov AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] Re: Copy version.h from tarball to git clone
In-Reply-To:	<20160910104002.GA2549@localhost.localdomain>
Message-ID:	<alpine.DEB.2.11.1609151346510.2675@nimbus>
References:	<20160822b AT crcomp DOT net> <20160824191235 DOT GE14293 AT localhost DOT localdomain> <20160824c AT crcomp DOT net> <alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 11 DOT 1609072126300 DOT 1392 AT nimbus> <20160910104002 DOT GA2549 AT localhost DOT localdomain>
User-Agent:	Alpine 2.11 (DEB 23 2013-08-11)
MIME-Version:	1.0
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Sat, 10 Sep 2016, Vladimir Zhbanov (vzhbanov AT gmail DOT com) [via 
geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 07, 2016 at 09:29:46PM +0200, Roland Lutz wrote:
>> As Vladimir already pointed out, the version.h problem can't really be 
>> related to Xorn.
>
> No, I haven't pointed this out.

I was referring to this statement from Tue, 23 Aug 2016: "This part has 
not changed since 2009. So it's probably something wrong on your side."

> I don't like that you promote it without any consensus with other 
> geda-gaf devs wrt basic project direction.

There is no consensus on this list.  Not for me refactoring libgeda, not 
for you extending the use of Scheme, not for *anything at all*.  The only 
available options are to leave anything as it is, or to improve things 
over time.  That's what I'm trying to do.

If you don't like it, you are free to articulate what you don't like about 
it, and why.  Like probably most people on this list, I'm open to 
constructive feedback.

I've understood your previous criticism, however, to be mainly about that 
it involves changing things, and that I'm not doing things using Scheme, 
which unfortunately isn't too helpful.  (Please correct me if I'm wrong.)

> I don't want to have two code bases with parallel functionality in
> one repository.

I don't want that, either; that's why I'm working on better integration.

> This prevents users from contributing as they don't know where to 
> contribute better.  I suggest you to make a clone of geda-gaf and name 
> it as you wish, say, geda-xorn, put it on git.geda-project.org and 
> administrate it

This sounds a lot like "please go away and do something else", which 
unfortunately has been the standard response to potential contributors for 
some time.

> I am going to remove any other language based additions (usually 
> supported by nobody) from the repository.

Which additions are you planning to remove?  Maybe someone on the list 
would like to volunteer maintaining them.

- Raw text -