X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
	:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	bh=A47bZfyW0sTCS1a930jDetKzGWGf2+jF8CmPpcjVvrE=;
	b=pfw20dVHprr1IY5Le6xUmeMu09DhyLmxbxdyb/ht3ukSp0TAc16BAvKPfhzXXppEhH
	9wA53VVXpkjjJqO+k0dDpRXkHbFbXZahMwaUAGClzbcP968d+iBZlCeCGnOqwexZE8r3
	lZZ1mRqZLFCZ3OR/7tbTnXhvGs1cPQk90AHnIoG1lkLvdMAsCC5qVhg+5bvdC2Vtx0VE
	JFmROz/JnaQyDNYyH3/tPlDmDzaOnRXfYtASAEFqmpMT6ly49tVzaihSG/nI5HHxxNFM
	mSDNNa/ktAtKxrUSsRPNGsU5e34Z7yW78cKVb646nFWZuofxJ1RQizn1Fo5Ca4KHCdhE
	Ly6Q==
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Received:	by 10.194.58.199 with SMTP id t7mr35457698wjq.45.1440374231305;
	Sun, 23 Aug 2015 16:57:11 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To:	<DA3A081C-C207-43E3-A70F-3DD12E68B440@noqsi.com>
References:	<55D8D8B8 DOT 7050907 AT jump-ing DOT de>
	<20150822230549 DOT 3750 DOT qmail AT stuge DOT se>
	<55D9A5AE DOT 9090604 AT jump-ing DOT de>
	<C2FC0AF3-DFDB-4799-87F7-039614405DCD AT noqsi DOT com>
	<201508231649 DOT t7NGnoM0029940 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
	<DA3A081C-C207-43E3-A70F-3DD12E68B440 AT noqsi DOT com>
Date:	Sun, 23 Aug 2015 15:57:11 -0800
Message-ID:	<CAC4O8c_e=yWhGkFfQ3WdTSBG7Roksm3GmhNQ+oFzeQYsT=LSGA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] Antifork
From:	"Britton Kerin (britton DOT kerin AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-MIME-Autoconverted:	from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id t7NNvGUW032239
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Sun, Aug 23, 2015 at 2:54 PM, John Doty <jpd AT noqsi DOT com> wrote:
>
> On Aug 23, 2015, at 12:49 PM, DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com> wrote:
>
>>
>>>> Ask Eagle or KiCAD users; they consider gEDA to be mostly dead,
>>>> because there's no visible development and newer developments also
>>>> don't get into Linux distributions.
>>>
>>> Why should we listen to people who don't understand how a toolkit works?
>>
>> Because they're right.
>>
>
> Baloney. They’re like people who expect Ornette Coleman to sound like Mozart. Nothing wrong with either, but they do not sound the same. If you think Eagle or KiCAD users are right, why don’t you join them?

Stop me where I go wrong:

1.  You don't use pcb
2.  You don't care about pcb
3.  All you care about is not breaking gschem
4.  If you actually believed others don't want to break it either, you
could stop your endless harping about toolkits vs. suits etc.

The features added to pcb that improve integration have improved the
usability of the framework *A LOT* for only very
small changes (in the ones I'm thinking of all on PCB side).  You
don't use pcb so have no worthwhile input on this.
You manage to be really annoying eventually, this is only possible
because people do actually respect your opinion.

I have a proposal for you: instead of reacting with general paranoia
to any talk of changes or integration, keep track of
specific proposals and object if they look like they're going to break
something.

Britton

- Raw text -