X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-SourceIP:	95.97.163.245
X-Authenticated-Sender:	b DOT mykendevelopment AT upcmail DOT nl
Message-ID:	<55B0D082.7020306@iae.nl>
Date:	Thu, 23 Jul 2015 13:31:14 +0200
From:	myken <myken AT iae DOT nl>
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] PCB development introduction 0.1
References:	<55B001A8 DOT 5010501 AT iae DOT nl> <201507222233 DOT t6MMXrJP020776 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
In-Reply-To:	<201507222233.t6MMXrJP020776@envy.delorie.com>
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com

> dolists.h is our way of implementing C++ constructors.
Ehh now I'm really confused about the dolists.h file.

dolists.h is included (according to doxygen) by two c files 
(hid/batch/batch.c and hid gcode/code.c).
If I look at the hid/batch/batch.c file I see that in line 12 hid.h is 
included, moving down I find in line 116 "REGISTER_ACTIONS 
(batch_action_list)", so I guess this one is taken from the hid.h file.
The dolists.h file isn't included until line 326, but the function 
hid_batch_init () after that doesn't seem to use the RESIGTER_* macros.
The same is true for the gcode.c file, the dolists.h isn't included 
until line 1577 just before the hid_gcode_init () function.

Is there some sophisticated c programming going on that I don't grasp?

- Raw text -