delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi   search  
Mail Archives: geda-user/2015/07/13/23:14:40

X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2015 23:14:32 -0400
Message-Id: <201507140314.t6E3EWAM031358@envy.delorie.com>
From: DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com>
To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to: <6C481B59-D7CC-43E5-B761-AD4C5A29F4A8@noqsi.com> (message from
John Doty on Mon, 13 Jul 2015 20:55:39 -0600)
Subject: Re: [geda-user] gEDA/gschem still alive?
References: <CAM2RGhQfPO31-1Uyc3kC7w286r0VD7c41UZEZcyYquzknCxbsQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <20150707060409 DOT GB14357 AT localhost DOT localdomain> <CAOP4iL2C_LU=RQy5FWYF-7RrHW6tqhqqyFJGjkwLQ2AD7FiYJA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <1436287952 DOT 678 DOT 26 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de> <559C0F7E DOT 7010009 AT neurotica DOT com> <1436295556 DOT 678 DOT 91 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de> <CAOuGh89C71vTW00QLQgVBAQy=m6Me8khjqep=eFH7KgKGqaSzw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <559C3778 DOT 4000105 AT neurotica DOT com> <20150708072021 DOT GB13243 AT visitor2 DOT iram DOT es> <C69A441D-23D3-43B3-8892-0AE219D3EC5B AT noqsi DOT com> <20150713082342 DOT GB26809 AT visitor2 DOT iram DOT es> <A6EB1F12-F56D-4AE4-9AC9-801BC51418A3 AT noqsi DOT com> <201507131725 DOT t6DHPU2V010794 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <A6AC6CBE-7C31-48BE-AD0D-62C9B2422ECF AT noqsi DOT com> <201507140209 DOT t6E29V39029166 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <6C481B59-D7CC-43E5-B761-AD4C5A29F4A8 AT noqsi DOT com>
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com

> If the wad of lines is too dense to follow without confusion, what
> good is it?

If the wad of lines is too dense to follow, you've failed as a
designer.  I've seen the dense wad of lines.  I've seen engineers dump
a design and start from scratch because it was "just a wad of dense
lines" and come up with something much more understandable but just as
complex.

> > Because not everyone wants to do things your way.
> 
> You're pushing graphics, but then you want tables in gschem, a
> graphics tool. Make up your mind.

You're playing with semantics to argue your point.  I've made up my
mind - I want small tables of related information on the same page as
the symbolic information, just like others might want text blocks,
images, simulation outputs, test data, pin numbers, or other relevant
information.

It's not about graphics vs text.  It's about putting related useful
information in a form that conveys design intent.

- Raw text -


  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright © 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019