X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Virus-Scanned:	amavisd-new at neurotica.com
X-NSA-prism-xkeyscore:	I do not consent to surveillance, prick
X-Original-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=neurotica.com;
	s=default; t=1436817861;
	bh=sbUu3BC0wJ9gbvSFDwbWXmFqwI5/gg26GO2zkGTXwho=;
	h=Date:From:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To;
	b=UvmR+SCz2tF3sbXmbBZ035qQzwYA0eeqNPdNOFAiW+85ZlHf4jdlBs2psVJAZitCY
	PsFnV3lLoz6ZT3G3WAABMe9WzEoFmy8lI0OtZ0sA+b6IPAzrE+uPDuf3KXiKUikhaX
	Lzby76+LA9tl2Yetdo3nirVqb8wuBqjEolc7pLPU=
Message-ID:	<55A419C5.6080206@neurotica.com>
Date:	Mon, 13 Jul 2015 16:04:21 -0400
From:	"Dave McGuire (mcguire AT neurotica DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] The new to do
References:	<CAM2RGhQ70Pex5aNeQ86vKHc7sKf_Vpws69__CPb2QKg6fJTeHg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <55A2A0A2 DOT 4080403 AT ecosensory DOT com> <7AE39440-DA68-4491-A965-C1B97D1D86C1 AT sbcglobal DOT net> <20150712213152 DOT 7968b74c AT jive DOT levalinux DOT org> <304D9D86-3CF6-4D61-A5CA-6CE414EA0661 AT sbcglobal DOT net> <20150712224637 DOT 2d4cc2de AT wind DOT levalinux DOT org> <55A2E9B7 DOT 9040502 AT neurotica DOT com> <CAM2RGhSmFhz9=oRaaj2EDL79c5XVmeuwmX_RdLqMv0evEHCyTw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <CACwWb3DbmOZbtb9Hrp2JvvG7-toryXuequQA=YV7X6ss762zsw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <20150713131707 DOT GA782 AT recycle DOT lbl DOT gov> <CAM2RGhTT__nWCkA4y36rb24yT8xP=o1nR04H=DNqTJiu=naSGA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <55A4042E DOT 5060402 AT neurotica DOT com> <55A41115 DOT 2060607 AT xs4all DOT nl>
In-Reply-To:	<55A41115.2060607@xs4all.nl>
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com

On 07/13/2015 03:27 PM, Bert Timmerman (bert DOT timmerman AT xs4all DOT nl) [via
geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote:
>>    I think what we need to motivate actual development, rather than
>> conversation, is cold hard CASH.  I'll kick in a few bucks for the next
>> round of development, whatever it may be, for gschem and PCB.
>>
>>    Anyone else?
>>    
> Just my proverbial 0.02 EUR.
> 
> IMHO, this is not fair towards the "pure" unpaid volunteers.
> 
> This approach put me off last time some bucks were collected through
> LinuxFund (1).
> 
> I could be tempted myself to hold off any commits until some cash was in
> sight and a paid for target identified.
> 
> To me this approach looks counter-productive on first, second and hind
> sight: if the financial threshold is not met, no commits will follow.
> 
> GSoC (2) is another way of getting some progress, although as soon as
> money or big job opportunities are in sight (last time) things can turn
> out sour (abandonware: I have no hard feelings though, it's just a pitah
> nobody was able to pick this one up and follow through, it's probably
> waaaaay over our heads --> magic stuff for a genius/wizard to master).
> 
> We are in this together and have to do the grunt work ourselves, long
> live the "doitocracy", these are your tools, let's keep them sharp and
> useful by (y)ourselves ;-)

  In general I agree, but few things motivate people more than cash.  I
wonder if there's some way to do it that actually works.

               -Dave

-- 
Dave McGuire, AK4HZ
New Kensington, PA

- Raw text -