X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:references
	:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to
	:user-agent;
	bh=P9hPfabu7UZzWxZul7kL6au3oH9zRxsWqTL1o+F6ehE=;
	b=urO1RFGR/rpAn4WtrlEr0Bme9p9XlrlfA4BSww8GEwi7dd6cezJAqlBsnjPuHcH0v5
	NyqN1gN2dJ8Jr7xD9eQRyVLLFOc68bF4ZZJurGkYbQbKUBH8YfXcfxj2Y/sQkd0bPDk7
	6QIqplOhnZYeQKBhY/G54qp8Y6Xr/xkSPqwtsa36MeVCqEeRrTc1cLNh0Qb348Cv7czr
	uyuJO8hT0wWdFMfzmEtbrc6xuz1bNcWoZE62FFNgNe2n1zajk7iv05bwHCW58kp2R7EP
	Nynvb2I9UxjW1lvEMzXDnWgpMyhLtdfFrTlFmy/Af9NxWmPgJ84+dMU0Nj+rnD3SxAGp
	vzLQ==
X-Received:	by 10.152.7.7 with SMTP id f7mr20612648laa.106.1436542936273;
	Fri, 10 Jul 2015 08:42:16 -0700 (PDT)
Date:	Fri, 10 Jul 2015 18:42:13 +0300
From:	"Vladimir Zhbanov (vzhbanov AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: patch testing, was Re: [geda-user] Repository Management was Re:
	developer excitement?
Message-ID:	<20150710154213.GD17023@localhost.localdomain>
Mail-Followup-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
References:	<CAM2RGhR3+FdR4PXTKa5CvSEAdcR=ifX_SgCPgS7NatCA14P9zQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1507091944210 DOT 6924 AT igor2priv>
	<CAGde_xP_0+-JTp13DM1LgOuUO-BWdB563yXEcqJjfdPE8S5tAg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<559EFCF0 DOT 5040007 AT neurotica DOT com>
	<20150710081049 DOT GA13669 AT localhost DOT localdomain>
	<CAM2RGhTPvQ9on+2BdgVBbp3kC4CsvCRZ-TFz+Rk3ZBfXy+21AQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<CAM2RGhTPvQ9on+2BdgVBbp3kC4CsvCRZ-TFz+Rk3ZBfXy+21AQ@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 10:39:54AM -0400, Evan Foss (evanfoss AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote:
...
> > This doesn't solve the problem if you want a clean environment.
> > Your config files would be still used.
> 
> How much danger are people really in from a testing version of gEDA?
> Are you guys worried about malware hiding in it or something?

I'm talking not about malware. This is convenient for testing gEDA
behaviour if you, for instance, need to check various config settings,
while not affecting your working configuration.

Cheers,
  Vladimir

- Raw text -