X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-TCPREMOTEIP:	207.224.51.38
X-Authenticated-UID:	jpd AT noqsi DOT com
Mime-Version:	1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] Back annotation
From:	John Doty <jpd AT noqsi DOT com>
In-Reply-To:	<559E8975.9050805@neurotica.com>
Date:	Thu, 9 Jul 2015 10:23:41 -0600
Message-Id:	<818298FE-2D6E-4B60-98E4-CAA8B37230CF@noqsi.com>
References:	<CAM2RGhTpfbqM7zNn72TBOjeL7B7LPT1PxSEU3+9aDdChFrPFTg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1507090507530 DOT 6924 AT igor2priv> <alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 11 DOT 1507091329350 DOT 3444 AT nimbus> <alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1507091404410 DOT 6924 AT igor2priv> <44FED82A-8277-427B-87A8-FBC5E9A3D0E5 AT noqsi DOT com> <alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 11 DOT 1507091601150 DOT 1892 AT nimbus> <11988591-8CA7-4132-B14A-21A53895E63E AT noqsi DOT com> <559E8975 DOT 9050805 AT neurotica DOT com>
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailer:	Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
X-MIME-Autoconverted:	from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id t69GNmGg001838
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Jul 9, 2015, at 8:47 AM, Dave McGuire (mcguire AT neurotica DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] <geda-user AT delorie DOT com> wrote:

> On 07/09/2015 10:25 AM, John Doty wrote:
>>>> If you’re just making changes until a diff shows nothing, it doesn’t matter whether you make them upstream or downstream. Just quit when you have a match!
>>> 
>>> This sounds reasonable to me.  So the common denominator is to load a "target netlist" into gschem and show the differences between the current state and the target state, either by highlighting them in the schematic or by showing a diff?  This shouldn't be too difficult to implement.
>> 
>> Not into gschem. Keep gschem clean, please. I just displayed a diff in a terminal window.
> 
>  Why are you assuming that adding this (or anything else!) will
> automatically make gschem "dirty"?
> 
>  First, maybe such new functionality could be made a configure-time
> option.  Second, and perhaps more intuitively...if you don't like a new
> feature, don't use it.

Features interact, so misfeatures get in the way. Box selection of groups of components in gschem used to be simple and straightforward, but added “features” have made it much more difficult.

> 
>               -Dave
> 
> -- 
> Dave McGuire, AK4HZ
> New Kensington, PA
> 
> 

John Doty              Noqsi Aerospace, Ltd.
http://www.noqsi.com/
jpd AT noqsi DOT com

- Raw text -