X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
	:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	bh=rZ3dW9kRx0N4M1huld8vg8uy2AdVyGx1R4R78Nk794M=;
	b=lRAW+7HfBiG6+Ki0aq7HLCfp6RbR1EjgGmStmux58Vemrp3NqSvJU3W2rKJ4zwbCu0
	bpQucRnfA6NLEan/Q5Xk/mWyoXX7APMOw5hTA0VK9ChV48ZZplkAeZmIQvi9njLQPl9Y
	7fdGOIuvfRIWCJ4ZqDbGtxqS9tjBldqFQsNdLCD4FoHO7J9/p6KuoWqb3bsEU4dufrFa
	dT/Ic5h3Vncml570g2ulswelm/kYSJTCgAU3KfLhOuCgpXItB+bUXBKCUJSvjyDYi9ig
	QiadjDVyBcAvmDNzmABJsjE6RlsxE4vvVsiqKSbLF7AzybRLQAhmt1ITANPw8XJGPcWl
	faSQ==
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Received:	by 10.152.21.37 with SMTP id s5mr15044401lae.2.1436455602708; Thu,
	09 Jul 2015 08:26:42 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To:	<559E8975.9050805@neurotica.com>
References:	<CAM2RGhTpfbqM7zNn72TBOjeL7B7LPT1PxSEU3+9aDdChFrPFTg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1507090507530 DOT 6924 AT igor2priv>
	<alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 11 DOT 1507091329350 DOT 3444 AT nimbus>
	<alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1507091404410 DOT 6924 AT igor2priv>
	<44FED82A-8277-427B-87A8-FBC5E9A3D0E5 AT noqsi DOT com>
	<alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 11 DOT 1507091601150 DOT 1892 AT nimbus>
	<11988591-8CA7-4132-B14A-21A53895E63E AT noqsi DOT com>
	<559E8975 DOT 9050805 AT neurotica DOT com>
Date:	Thu, 9 Jul 2015 11:26:42 -0400
Message-ID:	<CAM2RGhQ-dg1BNyZZZXN2m2=3LHE=-W6JLYMBouh=6fdxi7gH6Q@mail.gmail.com>
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] Back annotation
From:	"Evan Foss (evanfoss AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-MIME-Autoconverted:	from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id t69FQl76028822
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 10:47 AM, Dave McGuire (mcguire AT neurotica DOT com)
[via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] <geda-user AT delorie DOT com> wrote:
> On 07/09/2015 10:25 AM, John Doty wrote:
>>>> If you’re just making changes until a diff shows nothing, it doesn’t matter whether you make them upstream or downstream. Just quit when you have a match!
>>>
>>> This sounds reasonable to me.  So the common denominator is to load a "target netlist" into gschem and show the differences between the current state and the target state, either by highlighting them in the schematic or by showing a diff?  This shouldn't be too difficult to implement.
>>
>> Not into gschem. Keep gschem clean, please. I just displayed a diff in a terminal window.
>
>   Why are you assuming that adding this (or anything else!) will
> automatically make gschem "dirty"?

It would be dirty. It breaks the unix mentality by integrating too
much stuff into one program and violates the otherwise clean symmetry
we are going for in workflow.

Forward the flow is
gschem -> sch file -> gnetlist -> netlist file -> pcb
gschem -> sch file -> gsch2pcb -> pcb file -> pcb

the reverse should be something like
pcb -> pcb file -> pcb2netlist -> netlist file -> netlist2gsch -> sch
file -> gschem
pcb -> pcb file -> pcb2sch -> sch file -> gschem

See how each tool only does on step. That is one of the principles
that make gEDA great. Integrating more stuff into one program is more
like what kicad would do.

>   First, maybe such new functionality could be made a configure-time
> option.  Second, and perhaps more intuitively...if you don't like a new
> feature, don't use it.

Sorry I am still opposed here. If back annotation excites people
though I could work on that. It kind of flows with my current plans
anyway.

>                -Dave
>
> --
> Dave McGuire, AK4HZ
> New Kensington, PA
>



-- 
Home
http://evanfoss.googlepages.com/
Work
http://forge.abcd.harvard.edu/gf/project/epl_engineering/wiki/

- Raw text -