X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
	:content-type;
	bh=uZrfaOiJKIMUy6yd5I/Mb5n26zksYGlYrzKPRRj+rJE=;
	b=ARoguxV0hpgWz0FXv8l9vLJIBS83l9xdciQj5mPnPnhF+O/kR4AH04QqUuuEWd3xnn
	RjLO6V7cnMNaWxyn1mI3xZ5apiGRH5GmD0+iTMaUK51YyyNMG5GqCAa4Kedgrx9ftzW9
	LWsE6TZtKRbvgb56fn43Jo1FeOKvbCdyDIIhTAvFqI0iGYfQ6t7b83wF5jhJxyY9EvVE
	oATe2X6l+QzMPcXIfoaVNUgZtq4sbE5uSoescX+4X7fUD4CJZ/i7dWUV/W2asJBNpxaM
	qio/r+i5YqFsebIOuuBGjncJJMhtDVlyO6Uw2yO2DgJJ2Zhv5jha7eHSUnKn3bPMsyQA
	aVXA==
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Received:	by 10.107.46.159 with SMTP id u31mr17251521iou.69.1436360214659;
	Wed, 08 Jul 2015 05:56:54 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To:	<559C3778.4000105@neurotica.com>
References:	<1435510363 DOT 682 DOT 26 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de>
	<20150703030409 DOT 32398 DOT qmail AT stuge DOT se>
	<CAFC5WMoa2-z6bNca_bQN+jmMR260UBmoJQybUzH=L2TrBpzNNA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<1436006726 DOT 677 DOT 13 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de>
	<20150706200609 DOT GD24178 AT localhost DOT localdomain>
	<CAC4O8c9f0pLsLu_dyuO5ggh7RmHY1vAA=UUhk9AE0JYZb4mhBQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<CAM2RGhQfPO31-1Uyc3kC7w286r0VD7c41UZEZcyYquzknCxbsQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<20150707060409 DOT GB14357 AT localhost DOT localdomain>
	<CAOP4iL2C_LU=RQy5FWYF-7RrHW6tqhqqyFJGjkwLQ2AD7FiYJA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<1436287952 DOT 678 DOT 26 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de>
	<559C0F7E DOT 7010009 AT neurotica DOT com>
	<1436295556 DOT 678 DOT 91 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de>
	<CAOuGh89C71vTW00QLQgVBAQy=m6Me8khjqep=eFH7KgKGqaSzw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<559C3778 DOT 4000105 AT neurotica DOT com>
Date:	Wed, 8 Jul 2015 08:56:54 -0400
Message-ID:	<CAOuGh89G5eGP0Z9ORd6SdRv=LjiS4fhxYWTriRX-YBqx2f0DUA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] gEDA/gschem still alive?
From:	"Bob Paddock (graceindustries AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

>   Erlang looks fantastic, until you get to that
> nonintuitive-to-thepoint-of-incomprehensibility syntax!

That is where Elixir is coming form.
 I do think they made a mistake in getting rid of the single
assignment variables.

> (unless you're running an iAPX-432, which I'm assuming you
> aren't! ;))

Didn't I give you my 432 data books?
An obscure short lived processor that did end up influencing those
that came after it.

Have any 432 based machines in your collection?

BTW, I would not describer your place as a rock.  More of a cave. :-)

Seriously, everyone really should make a trip to see the computer
museum Dave is setting up.
I've wondered around the maze of many machines he has in this large
warehouse sized setting.
Impressive collection.

- Raw text -