X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Virus-Scanned:	amavisd-new at neurotica.com
X-NSA-prism-xkeyscore:	I do not consent to surveillance, prick
X-Original-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=neurotica.com;
	s=default; t=1436298392;
	bh=HREORJ4NzJ7Mh3BHOSUzntYpSDBGqxf4aG4rQrBM1Xs=;
	h=Date:From:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To;
	b=FslPi+bcjyAGifSM372tw7nbfNoHojcbm5yqPxMo4zJ7BQp0UnyPBgNB/vF36WxVO
	bhKAz8wHibDsJ10yeMKcZ8nZUyXt5lWxhQbS/cAFyOw1yrriv5E6GhoXeFbJU+YaM2
	pak+8FvfRUHINtWG+YCN6UiGNrx9PuTP0AB3wAUY=
Message-ID:	<559C2C97.4030204@neurotica.com>
Date:	Tue, 07 Jul 2015 15:46:31 -0400
From:	"Dave McGuire (mcguire AT neurotica DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] gEDA/gschem still alive?
References:	<1435510363 DOT 682 DOT 26 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de> <20150703030409 DOT 32398 DOT qmail AT stuge DOT se> <CAFC5WMoa2-z6bNca_bQN+jmMR260UBmoJQybUzH=L2TrBpzNNA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <1436006726 DOT 677 DOT 13 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de> <20150706200609 DOT GD24178 AT localhost DOT localdomain> <CAC4O8c9f0pLsLu_dyuO5ggh7RmHY1vAA=UUhk9AE0JYZb4mhBQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <CAM2RGhQfPO31-1Uyc3kC7w286r0VD7c41UZEZcyYquzknCxbsQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <20150707060409 DOT GB14357 AT localhost DOT localdomain> <CAOP4iL2C_LU=RQy5FWYF-7RrHW6tqhqqyFJGjkwLQ2AD7FiYJA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1507071749560 DOT 6924 AT igor2priv> <CAM2RGhRA9Qt_PNUNzvaZ7OjjKDvrWobCJ2CptFYhBojtbxXXCA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <559C0F7D DOT 4020600 AT neurotica DOT com> <201507071805 DOT t67I5tFG012669 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <559C1B73 DOT 7040506 AT neurotica DOT com> <201507071838 DOT t67IcjWJ014955 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
In-Reply-To:	<201507071838.t67IcjWJ014955@envy.delorie.com>
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com

On 07/07/2015 02:38 PM, DJ Delorie wrote:
>>   That'd work too.  But nothing else I've seen (that I can recall
>> offhand anyway) has used URLs, and I have to believe there was a
>> reason behind it.  I myself am not opposed to it, even though URL
>> syntax is really quite gross.
> 
> Yeah, but I really want to see an EDA package that integrates with the
> internet :-)

  Well put.

> I mean, if I suggested the url git://github.com/example/library.git/
> half the people here would start begging me for it ;-)

  Too true. ;)

             -Dave

-- 
Dave McGuire, AK4HZ
New Kensington, PA

- Raw text -