X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
	:content-type;
	bh=lccwtsXNEF+9kpOtKxNe7lJz5GKPLfxJxRLRUXIzgNs=;
	b=zASYGvkVBSR9UB5WaHgyqrP9jjIUcYhmQXZgSns+aCl9ORmxB3MLmks29+VrQDSznU
	zl2ANI8Lur/yZbMW7q+mVR8PtROC6IYbZCcNOkD5itQRK0G4Fpfu0vUAwDKnd44I/ux5
	xJVDdcd4vdsDkMPWj2aLYt9hmPxghWLUc0h0DouCVB1G5DiiuG+47tqGB8sSEOKdrIds
	BISpf1q/tdpSSgQYbN92z5xn5TLEy0ecBNQ5GtLn7mgQcsF5a/Oujwu5T4LQKiKels0U
	5rIk83FFSLUdZfvFw5YR6ZELnkkp952NjAGiJv6Fnu4BN1+euQWKZRRDJi9yijdlUI8R
	twoQ==
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Received:	by 10.52.3.42 with SMTP id 10mr1291452vdz.10.1436220687518; Mon,
	06 Jul 2015 15:11:27 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To:	<20150706200609.GD24178@localhost.localdomain>
References:	<1435510363 DOT 682 DOT 26 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de>
	<20150703030409 DOT 32398 DOT qmail AT stuge DOT se>
	<CAFC5WMoa2-z6bNca_bQN+jmMR260UBmoJQybUzH=L2TrBpzNNA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<1436006726 DOT 677 DOT 13 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de>
	<20150706200609 DOT GD24178 AT localhost DOT localdomain>
Date:	Mon, 6 Jul 2015 14:11:27 -0800
Message-ID:	<CAC4O8c9f0pLsLu_dyuO5ggh7RmHY1vAA=UUhk9AE0JYZb4mhBQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] gEDA/gschem still alive?
From:	"Britton Kerin (britton DOT kerin AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Mon, Jul 6, 2015 at 12:06 PM, Vladimir Zhbanov (vzhbanov AT gmail DOT com)
[via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] <geda-user AT delorie DOT com> wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 04, 2015 at 12:45:26PM +0200, Stefan Salewski wrote:
> ...
>> I know that gEDA documentation is verbose and ugly -- but no one will
> Stefan,
> If you think some part of the documentation is ugly, please file a bug
> report on this adding the info you want to see changed/added/... or
> do this here. We certainly lack people who could read and edit the
> documentation we have or submit constructive changes to apply.

I doubt it's worth bothering.  I tried years ago and was told to go away.
They like the docs the way they are, complete with wordy descriptions
of self and bad instructions on how to use git.

Britton

- Raw text -